Comparative Analysis of Urban Development Trends of Beijing and Karachi Metropolitan Areas

被引:29
作者
Mangi, Muhammad Yousif [1 ,2 ]
Yue, Zhang [1 ]
Kalwar, Saima [2 ]
Lashari, Zulfiqar Ali [2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Architecture, Dept Urban Planning, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Mehran Univ Engn & Technol, Dept City & Reg Planning, Jamshoro 76062, Pakistan
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
urbanization; urban sustainability; urban development; metropolitan; socio-economic; environmental; Beijing; Karachi; LAND-USE; SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; CHINA URBANIZATION; CHALLENGES; CITIES; CITY; SYSTEM; INDEX; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.3390/su12020451
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban sustainability has become a significant challenge globally due to rapidly growing urbanization and industrialization. Hence, this study was conducted to examine the existing urban development trends of metropolitan cities (i.e., Beijing and Karachi) of China and Pakistan in the context of urban sustainability. The development progress in both cities was examined through urban sustainability indices individually and compared with each other. An index system considering 36 indicators was developed based on social, economic, and environmental aspects. The six years (2012-2017) of data used in this study, were obtained from various governmental websites. Furthermore, the Urban Sustainability Index (USI) was evaluated using the statistical standard equal-weighted method. Results revealed that Beijing's developmental progress is much better than Karachi in terms of socio-economic and environmental development, but there is still a need for improvement. While Karachi faces problems in all three sectors, each indicator of these sectors requires considerable improvement for attaining the top level of the Urban Sustainability Index. However, this study recommends that much attention is needed in the case of Karachi city, whereas Beijing also needs quality advancement in urban development.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 124 条
  • [31] Ferrer M., 2015, NEW SCH PUBLIC ENGAG
  • [32] Evaluation of Developmental Progress in Some Cities of Punjab, Pakistan, Using Urban Sustainability Indicators
    Ghalib, Ambreen
    Qadir, Abdul
    Ahmad, Sajid Rashid
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (08):
  • [33] Urban expansion dynamics and modes in metropolitan Guangzhou, China
    Gong, Jianzhou
    Hu, Zhiren
    Chen, Wenli
    Liu, Yansui
    Wang, Jieyong
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 72 : 100 - 109
  • [34] Assessing the sustainability of Spanish cities considering environmental and socio-economic indicators
    Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara
    Manteiga, Rocio
    Teresa Moreira, Maria
    Feijoo, Gumersindo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 178 : 599 - 610
  • [35] Government of Republic of Indonesia, 2004, Law of Republic of Indonesia No.40 year of 2004 about Social Security System, P1
  • [36] China's urbanization in 1949-2015: Processes and driving forces
    Gu Chaolin
    Hu Lingqian
    Cook, Ian G.
    [J]. CHINESE GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 27 (06) : 847 - 859
  • [37] HAN HY, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI DOI 10.3390/su11174798
  • [38] Impact of urbanization level on urban air quality: A case of fine particles (PM2.5) in Chinese cities
    Han, Lijian
    Zhou, Weiqi
    Li, Weifeng
    Li, Li
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2014, 194 : 163 - 170
  • [39] Hasan A., EMERGING URBANISATIO
  • [40] Hasan A., 2013, CHOICE REV ONLINE, V32, P3595, DOI [10.5860/choice.32-3595, DOI 10.5860/CHOICE.32-3595]