Frequency response function and shaking control of the ZJU-400 geotechnical centrifuge shaker

被引:8
作者
Zhou, Yan-Guo [1 ]
Meng, Di [1 ]
Ma, Qiang [1 ]
Ling, Dao-Sheng [1 ]
Huang, Bo [1 ]
Chen, Yun-Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Inst Geotech Engn, MOE Key Lab Soft Soils & Geoenvironm Engn, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
centrifuge modelling; dynamics; earthquakes; LEAP-GWU-2015; CENTRIFUGE; SOIL LIQUEFACTION; PERFORMANCE; CONTAINER; ACTUATOR; SLOPE;
D O I
10.1680/jphmg.19.00029
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
In dynamic centrifuge modelling, shaking control is one of the key technologies and has important effects on the accuracy and repeatability of the model tests. In this study, a series of analyses and experiments is performed to study the frequency response functions (FRFs) and shaking performance of the in-flight hydraulic shaker on a geotechnical centrifuge at Zhejiang University (i.e. ZJU-400). First, based on an analytical model of the bucket-shaker-container system with interaction with the servo-hydraulic system, parametric studies on the FRF were conducted to identify the key variables in shaking control. Then a suite of dynamic centrifuge model tests were conducted under different centrifugal accelerations, payloads and shaking amplitudes, to observe the FRFs between the command and the achieved accelerations at the table. The results reveal that FRF is affected by several factors including the shaking amplitude, model parameters and centrifugal acceleration, where the shaking amplitude is the dominant factor. The FRF cluster model of the shaker was established and a feed-forward control procedure is proposed to facilitate the possibility of well-controlled shaking with only one try. The validation model tests show that the proposed procedure secures a satisfactory accuracy of the waveform replication for both sine waves and earthquake motions.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 117
页数:21
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Centrifuge and Large-Scale Modeling of Seismic Pore Pressures in Sands: Cyclic Strain Interpretation [J].
Abdoun, T. ;
Gonzalez, M. A. ;
Thevanayagam, S. ;
Dobry, R. ;
Elgamal, A. ;
Zeghal, M. ;
Mercado, V. M. ;
El Shamy, U. .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 139 (08) :1215-1234
[2]  
Afacan K.M., 2014, THESIS
[3]   Centrifuge Modeling Studies of Site Response in Soft Clay over Wide Strain Range [J].
Afacan, Kamil B. ;
Brandenberg, Scott J. ;
Stewart, Jonathan P. .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 140 (02)
[4]   Experimental study in the shaking table of the input motion characteristics in the dynamic SSI of a SDOF model [J].
Biondi, Giovanni ;
Massimino, Maria Rossella ;
Maugeri, Michele .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2015, 13 (06) :1835-1869
[5]  
Brennan A.J., 2014, PHYS MODELLING GEOTE, P227
[6]   LEAP-GWU-2015 centrifuge test at UC Davis [J].
Carey, Trevor J. ;
Hashimoto, Takuma ;
Cimini, Daniel ;
Kutter, Bruce L. .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 113 :663-670
[7]   Original technologies for proven performances for the new LCPC earthquake simulator [J].
Chazelas, J. L. ;
Escoffier, S. ;
Garnier, J. ;
Thorel, L. ;
Rault, G. .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2008, 6 (04) :723-728
[8]  
Chen YM, 2010, PHYSICAL MODELLING IN GEOTECHNICS, VOLS. 1 AND 2, P223
[9]  
Conte JP, 2000, EARTHQUAKE ENG STRUC, V29, P1375, DOI 10.1002/1096-9845(200009)29:9<1375::AID-EQE975>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-3