A fast and scalable approach for IoT service selection based on a physical service model

被引:45
作者
Jin, Xiongnan [1 ]
Chun, Sejin [1 ]
Jung, Jooik [1 ]
Lee, Kyong-Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Internet of things; Physical service model; Physical service selection; Absolute dominance relationship; ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS; WEB SERVICES; INTERNET; THINGS;
D O I
10.1007/s10796-016-9650-1
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Information Systems (ISs) have become one of the crucial tools for various organizations in managing and coordinating business processes. Now we are entering the era of the Internet of Things (IoT). IoT is a paradigm in which real-world physical things can be connected to the Internet and provide services through the computing devices attached. The IoT infrastructure is starting to be integrated with ISs thereby diminishing the boundaries between the physical world and the business IT systems. With the development of IoT technologies, the number of connected things and their available physical services are increasing rapidly. Thus, selecting an appropriate service that satisfies a user's requirements from such services becomes a time-consuming challenge. To address this issue, we propose a Physical Service Model (PSM) as a common conceptual model to describe heterogeneous IoT physical services. PSM contains three core concepts (device, resource, and service) and specifies their relationships. Based on the proposed PSM, we define three types of Quality of Service (QoS) attributes and rate candidate services according to user requirements. To dynamically rate QoS values and select an appropriate physical service, we propose a Physical Service Selection (PSS) method that takes a user preference and an absolute dominance relationship among physical services into account. Finally, experiments are conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:1357 / 1372
页数:16
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Agarwal Vikas, 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), P275, DOI 10.1109/ICWS.2010.39
[2]  
Alrifai Mohammad, 2010, P 19 INT C WORLD WID, P11, DOI DOI 10.1145/1772690.1772693
[3]  
[Anonymous], SOAP VERSION 1 2 1
[4]  
[Anonymous], OWL S SEMANTIC MARKU
[5]  
[Anonymous], COORD BUILD BROADL B
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, DOI [10.1145/514183.514185, DOI 10.1145/514183.514185]
[7]  
[Anonymous], P INT C SERV OR COMP
[8]   The Internet of Things: A survey [J].
Atzori, Luigi ;
Iera, Antonio ;
Morabito, Giacomo .
COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2010, 54 (15) :2787-2805
[9]   Internet of Things: Applications and Challenges in Technology and Standardization [J].
Bandyopadhyay, Debasis ;
Sen, Jaydip .
WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2011, 58 (01) :49-69
[10]   Internet of Things for Enterprise Systems of Modern Manufacturing [J].
Bi, Zhuming ;
Xu, Li Da ;
Wang, Chengen .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2014, 10 (02) :1537-1546