Understanding radiographic decision-making when imaging obese patients: A Think-Aloud study

被引:11
作者
Grace, Seo [1 ]
John, Robinson [1 ]
Amanda, Punch [1 ]
Yobelli, Jimenez [1 ]
Sarah, Lewis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Discipline Med Radiat Sci, City Rd, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
关键词
adaptive technique; education; obesity; obesity decision-making; radiography; EXPOSURE FACTOR SELECTION; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; OPTIMIZATION; IMPACT; INDEX;
D O I
10.1002/jmrs.543
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: The incidence of obesity has been steadily rising over the last few decades and is having a significant impact upon the health system. In radiography, a particular challenge of imaging obese patients is implementing the as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle when determining radiation dose, and technical and patient-care adaptations. This study aimed to better understand the decision-making strategies of experienced radiographers in determining imaging and exposure factor selection in the context of imaging obese patients. Methods: This study employed a `think-aloud,' methodology, and eight experienced diagnostic radiographers working in clinical education were recruited to perform routine AP abdominal X-ray projections on an anthropomorphic phantom. They were asked to simultaneously verbalise emerging thoughts as they considered positioning, exposure selection and image evaluation. This process was repeated with three different phantom sizes, each representing an increased BMI from `healthy,' to, `morbidly obese.' Audio recordings were transcribed and interpreted via Bowman's (1997) theory of radiographic judgement and decision-making. Results: Analysis of interview transcripts identified 12 key concepts considered by experienced radiographers. Differences in radiographic concepts were considered when imaging phantoms of different sizes was demonstrated. A shift from segmental (e.g. positioning) to more environmental factors (e.g. patient comfort) and an increase in the number of verbal considerations with increasing phantom size were identified. The shift in focus of decision-making stages identified the greater need to consider contextual factors such as patient comfort and repeatability when imaging obese patients. Conclusion: Experienced radiographers find imaging obese patients challenging and alter their perception of image quality to accommodate for patient presentation. The findings will help inform future research, practice guidelines and learning resources to provide optimal imaging and care for obese patients, especially for student education.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 23
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Increased radiation dose and projected radiation-related lifetime cancer risk in patients with obesity due to projection radiography [J].
Alqahtani, Saeed J. M. ;
Welbourn, Richard ;
Meakin, Judith R. ;
Palfrey, Rachel M. ;
Rimes, Susan J. ;
Thomson, Katharine ;
Knapp, Karen M. .
JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2019, 39 (01) :38-53
[2]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2020, OV OB INT INS
[3]   Australian diagnostic radiographers' attitudes and perceptions of imaging obese patients: A study of self, peers and students [J].
Aweidah, L. ;
Robinson, J. ;
Cumming, S. ;
Lewis, S. .
RADIOGRAPHY, 2016, 22 (04) :E258-E263
[4]   Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study [J].
Bertin, Christophe L. ;
Ponthus, Simon ;
Vivekanantham, Hari ;
Poletti, Pierre-Alexandre ;
Kherad, Omar ;
Rutschmann, Olivier T. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (1)
[5]  
Bowman S., 1997, Current topics in radiography, V1st, P69
[6]  
Buckley O., 2008, IRISH MED TIMES, V42, P36
[7]   Imaging obese patients: problems and solutions [J].
Carucci, Laura R. .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2013, 38 (04) :630-646
[8]   Patient-based radiographic exposure factor selection: a systematic review [J].
Ching, William ;
Robinson, John ;
McEntee, Mark .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2014, 61 (03) :176-190
[9]   Decision Making and Variation in Radiation Exposure Factor Selection by Radiologic Technologists [J].
Darcy, Sarah ;
Rainford, Louise ;
Kelly, Brendan ;
Toomey, Rachel .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2015, 46 (04) :372-379
[10]   Current state of practice regarding digital radiography exposure indicators and deviation indices: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 232 [J].
Dave, Jaydev K. ;
Jones, A. Kyle ;
Fisher, Ryan ;
Hulme, Katie ;
Rill, Lynn ;
Zamora, David ;
Woodward, Andrew ;
Brady, Samuel ;
MacDougall, Robert D. ;
Goldman, Lee ;
Lang, Susan ;
Peck, Donald ;
Apgar, Bruce ;
Shepard, S. Jeff ;
Uzenoff, Robert ;
Willis, Charles .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (11) :E1146-E1160