Plant-animal associations in two species of seagrasses in Western Australia

被引:48
|
作者
Jernakoff, P [1 ]
Nielsen, J [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, Div Marine Res, N Beach, WA, Australia
关键词
seagrass; periphyton; epiphytes; epifauna;
D O I
10.1016/S0304-3770(97)00100-9
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Relationships between algal epiphytes and epifaunal invertebrates (amphipods, molluscs and polychaetes) occurring within meadows of the seagrasses Posidonia sinuosa and Amphibolis griffithii were compared along the south west coast of Western Australia. Although the seagrasses are very different structurally, many species of algal epiphytes and epifaunal grazers were common to both. However, meadows of Amphibolis supported a greater number of both algal epiphyte and epifaunal species. The long-lived stems of Amphibolis supported a larger biomass of algal epiphytes and grazers than did the leaves of either Posidonia or Amphibolis. The densities and biomass of epifauna were variable but on a comparison adjusted to the biomass of seagrass, both the density and biomass of the taxonomic groups were similar between seagrass species except that the density of grazing gastropods and the biomass of polychaetes were greater in Amphibolis (by 238% and 252%, respectively). Nested analyses of variance (ANOVA) indicated that variations in plant and animal biomass differed at all spatial scales (sites, meadows within sites and replicates) and the pattern was inconsistent amongst biota, However, a significant proportion of the variability occurred between replicate samples. Canonical correlation and multiple regression analyses indicated that associations between algal epiphytes and epifauna were also inconsistent and differed between seagrass species. These patterns highlight the importance of seagrass species and structural complexity in affecting both the epiphytic and grazer community. The importance of spatial scales at which seagrasses and their associated communities are sampled are equally important because of the differing levels of spatial patchiness. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 376
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Plant-animal communication: past, present and future
    Leonard, Anne S.
    Francis, Jacob S.
    EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 2017, 31 (02) : 143 - 151
  • [22] A multiplexed plant-animal SNP array for selective breeding and species conservation applications
    Montanari, Sara
    Deng, Cecilia
    Koot, Emily
    Bassil, Nahla, V
    Zurn, Jason D.
    Morrison-Whittle, Peter
    Worthington, Margaret L.
    Aryal, Rishi
    Ashrafi, Hamid
    Pradelles, Julien
    Wellenreuther, Maren
    Chagne, David
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2023, 13 (10):
  • [23] Role of plant sensory perception in plant-animal interactions
    Mescher, Mark C.
    De Moraes, Consuelo M.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2015, 66 (02) : 425 - 433
  • [24] COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN SEAGRASSES IN SOUTHERN WESTERN AUSTRALIA
    KIRKMAN, H
    AQUATIC BOTANY, 1985, 21 (04) : 363 - 375
  • [25] An integrative approach to the study of plant-animal interactions
    Smallwood, PD
    AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST, 2001, 41 (04): : 807 - 809
  • [26] PLANT-ANIMAL INTERACTIONS IN LARKSPUR POISONING IN CATTLE
    RALPHS, MH
    OLSEN, JD
    PFISTER, JA
    MANNERS, GD
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1988, 66 (09) : 2334 - 2342
  • [27] PLANT-ANIMAL POLLINATION SYSTEMS .2. FEWER POLLINATOR THAN PLAN SPECIES
    WELLS, H
    AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST, 1985, 25 (04): : A9 - A9
  • [28] Physiology on a landscape scale: Plant-animal interactions
    Porter, WP
    Sabo, JL
    Tracy, CR
    Reichman, OJ
    Ramankutty, N
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2002, 42 (03) : 431 - 453
  • [29] Plant-animal mutualistic networks: The architecture of biodiversity
    Bascompte, Jordi
    Jordano, Pedro
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY EVOLUTION AND SYSTEMATICS, 2007, 38 : 567 - 593
  • [30] PLANT-ANIMAL COEVOLUTION - TWENTIETH SYSTEMATICS SYMPOSIUM
    DAVIDSE, G
    ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN, 1974, 61 (03) : 674 - 674