Comparison between Transthoracic Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients Status Post Atrial Switch Procedure

被引:8
|
作者
Ho, Jason G. [1 ]
Cohen, Mervyn D. [2 ]
Ebenroth, Eric S. [1 ]
Schamberger, Marcus S. [1 ]
Cordes, Timothy M. [1 ]
Bramlet, Matthew T. [1 ]
Hurwitz, Roger A. [1 ]
Johnson, Tiffanie R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Pediat Cardiol Sect, Dept Pediat, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Riley Hosp Children, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance; Echocardiography; Atrial Switch; Mustard; Senning; Comparison; RIGHT-VENTRICULAR-FUNCTION; CONGENITAL HEART-DISEASE; GREAT-ARTERIES; MUSTARD OPERATION; D-TRANSPOSITION; FAILURE; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1747-0803.2011.00571.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. This study compares image quality, cost, right ventricular ejection fraction analysis, and baffle visualization between transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in those status post atrial switch for transposition of the great arteries. Background. This population requires imaging for serial evaluations. Transthoracic echocardiography is often first line but has drawbacks, many of which are addressed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Methods. Twelve patients (mean age 25 years) with relatively concurrent (mean 157 days) studies were included. Three separate echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging physicians independently analyzed baffles, image quality, and right ventricular ejection fractions. Institutional and Medicaid charges were compared. Results. For right ventricular ejection fraction, echocardiography (36.1%) underestimated cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (47.8%, P =.002). Image quality for transthoracic echocardiography was significantly rated lower than cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (P =.002). Baffles were better seen in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (transthoracic echocardiography vs. cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: superior vena cava 86% vs. 100% [P =.063]; inferior vena cava 33% vs. 97% [P =.002]; pulmonary vein 92% vs. 100% [P =.250]). Comparing hospital charges and Medicaid reimbursement, transthoracic echocardiography respectively costs 18% and 38% less than cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Conclusions. In conclusion, transthoracic echocardiography underestimated right ventricular ejection fraction compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging had consistently higher image quality and better visualization of the baffles. Cost differences are minimal. We propose that cardiac magnetic resonance imaging be considered first line for imaging in certain patients' status post atrial switch procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 130
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Echocardiography vs cardiac magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the systemic right ventricle for patients with d-transposition of the great arteries status post atrial switch
    Samyn, Margaret M.
    Yan, Ke
    Masterson, Conor
    Goot, Benjamin H.
    Saudek, David
    Lavoie, Julie
    Kinney, Aaron
    Krolikowski, Mary
    Hor, Kan
    Cohen, Scott
    CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE, 2019, 14 (06) : 1138 - 1148
  • [2] Quantification of Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis in Pediatric Patients: Comparison Between Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography
    Sirin, Selma
    Nassenstein, Kai
    Neudorf, Ulrich
    Jensen, Christoph J.
    Mikat, Christian
    Schlosser, Thomas
    PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (05) : 771 - 777
  • [3] Quantification of Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis in Pediatric Patients: Comparison Between Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography
    Selma Sirin
    Kai Nassenstein
    Ulrich Neudorf
    Christoph J. Jensen
    Christian Mikat
    Thomas Schlosser
    Pediatric Cardiology, 2014, 35 : 771 - 777
  • [4] Utility of speckle tracking echocardiography in measuring systemic right ventricular systolic function for patients with d-transposition of the great arteries status post atrial switch procedure: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
    Conor Masterson
    David Saudek
    Scott Cohen
    Julie Slicker
    Aaron Kinney
    Mary Krolikowski
    Margaret M Samyn
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 18 (Suppl 1)
  • [5] Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography: Investigation of Concordance between the Two Methods for Measurement of the Cardiac Chamber
    Gurdogan, Muhammet
    Ustabasioglu, Fethi Emre
    Kula, Osman
    Korkmaz, Selcuk
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2019, 55 (06):
  • [6] Prospective Comparison of Valve Regurgitation Quantitation by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography
    Cawley, Peter J.
    Hamilton-Craig, Christian
    Owens, David S.
    Krieger, Eric V.
    Strugnell, Wendy E.
    Mitsumori, Lee
    D'Jang, Caryn L.
    Schwaegler, Rebecca G.
    Nguyen, Khanh Q.
    Bianca Nguyen
    Maki, Jeffrey H.
    Otto, Catherine M.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2013, 6 (01) : 48 - 57
  • [7] Right Atrial Mass Assessment by Transthoracic Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
    Hotta, Viviane Tiemi
    Alberton, James
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2011, 97 (03) : E58 - E59
  • [8] Quantification of mitral regurgitation using transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
    ElTahlawy, Walid MS.
    Ragab, Tamer M.
    Elkhashab, Khaled A.
    Ebeid, Hassan M.
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (01) : 215 - 223
  • [9] The evaluation of mitral valve stenosis: comparison of transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance
    Helvacioglu, Funda
    Yildirimturk, Ozlem
    Duran, Cihan
    Yurdakul, Selen
    Tayyareci, Yelda
    Ulusoy, Onur Levent
    Aytekin, Saide
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2014, 15 (02) : 164 - 169
  • [10] Accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of proximal aortic diameter in hypertensive patients: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance
    Leone, Dario
    Tosello, Francesco
    Faletti, Riccardo
    Schivazappa, Giulia
    Bruno, Giulia
    Avenatti, Eleonora
    Ravera, Agnese
    Veglio, Franco
    Milan, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2017, 35 (08) : 1626 - 1634