Entrustable professional activities in nursing education: a scoping review protocol

被引:10
作者
Alexander, Nicholas [1 ]
Maaz, Asja [1 ]
Peters, Harm [2 ]
Kottner, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Inst Clin Nursing Sci, Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dieter Scheffner Ctr Med Educ, Berlin, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 10期
关键词
EDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training); Protocols & guidelines; MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING; PRIMARY CARE; ACTIVITIES EPAS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061451
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Entrustable professional activities were introduced in medical education more than 15 years ago. EPAs define units of professional practice that can be fully entrusted to sufficiently competent professionals. Today, EPAs have been developed and implemented in many health professions, as the concept is useful in bridging the gap between competency-based education and the daily tasks health professions have to deal with in the workplace. While some evidence exists in medical education, the role of EPAs in nursing education is not yet fully understood. Therefore, the overall aim of this scoping review is to describe the current body of evidence regarding EPA implementation in nursing education. Methods and analysis A two-stage screening process will be used during the search phase, in order to screen retrieved abstracts and titles that focus primarily on the discussion of EPA in nursing education in all languages within the last two decades. The electronic databases, OVID (Embase and PubMed combined) and EBSCOhost (CINHAL and ERIC combined), as well as grey literature will be searched. The search period ranges from 1 January 1995 to 31 December 2021. Data will be extracted according to study design, context (geographical location and type of nursing programme), details of EPAs mentioned (title, specifications, limitations and competency domains), as well as evidence of implementation, outcomes and effect sizes. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required as this review will be using previously collected data. Review findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Entrustable professional activities in nursing: A concept analysis
    Al-Moteri, Modi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCES, 2020, 7 (03) : 277 - 284
  • [2] Exploring the Utility of Entrustable Professional Activities as a Framework to Enhance Nurse Practitioner Education
    Anthamatten, Angelina
    Pfieffer, Mary Lauren
    Richmond, Anna
    Glassford, Melissa
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATOR, 2020, 45 (02) : 83 - 87
  • [3] Design, implementation and evaluation of novel work-based clinical assessment tool: An e-portfolio with embedded Entrustable Professional Activities
    Bramley, Andrea
    Forsyth, Adrienne
    McKenna, Lisa
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2021, 107
  • [4] Cate Olle Ten, 2018, Korean J Med Educ, V30, P1, DOI 10.3946/kjme.2018.76
  • [5] RE-ENVISIONING CLINICAL EDUCATION FOR NURSE PRACTITIONER PROGRAMS: THEMES FROM A NATIONAL LEADERS' DIALOGUE
    Giddens, Jean Foret
    Lauzon-Clabo, Laurie
    Morton, Patricia Gonce
    Jeffries, Pamela
    McQuade-Jones, Bambi
    Ryan, Sandra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING, 2014, 30 (03) : 273 - 278
  • [6] Haines ST, 2017, AM J PHARM EDUC, V81, DOI 10.5688/ajpe811S2
  • [7] Evaluating Entrustable Professional Activities in a Nurse Practitioner Readiness for Practice Simulation
    Keating, Stefanie
    McLeod-Sordjan, Renee
    Lemp, Mary
    Willenbrock, Donna
    Fried, Anne Marie
    Cassara, Michael
    [J]. JNP-JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2021, 17 (05): : 611 - 614
  • [8] Development of undergraduate nursing entrustable professional activities to enhance clinical care and practice
    Lau, Siew Tiang
    Ang, Emily
    Samarasekera, Dujeepa D.
    Shorey, Shefaly
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2020, 87
  • [9] Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
    Levac, Danielle
    Colquhoun, Heather
    O'Brien, Kelly K.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2010, 5
  • [10] Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods
    Lockwood, Craig
    dos Santos, Kelli Borgess
    Pap, Robin
    [J]. ASIAN NURSING RESEARCH, 2019, 13 (05) : 287 - 294