Types, patterns, and predictors of coping with stress during pregnancy: Examination of the Revised Prenatal Coping Inventory in a diverse sample

被引:92
作者
Hamilton, Jada G. [1 ]
Lobel, Marci [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Psychol, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
pregnancy; coping; Prenatal Coping Inventory; stress; planning; preparation; avoidance; prayer;
D O I
10.1080/01674820701690624
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The present study investigated coping in early, mid-, and late pregnancy in 321 ethnically and socioeconomically diverse women of varying medical risk. The goal was to determine how women cope with stress across pregnancy and to explore the association of coping with maternal characteristics, stress perceptions, disposition, and social support. Factor analysis of the Revised Prenatal Coping Inventory revealed three distinct types of coping: Planning-Preparation, Avoidance, and Spiritual-Positive Coping. Spiritual coping was used most frequently during pregnancy; avoidant coping was used least often. As hypothesized, use of spiritual coping and avoidance differed across pregnancy. Planning was used more consistently across time. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that the strongest predictors of planning were high optimism and pregnancy-specific distress. Avoidance was most strongly predicted by high state anxiety and pregnancy-specific distress. Greater religiosity and optimism were the strongest predictors of spiritual coping. These results add to a body of evidence that women use distinctive and varied strategies to manage stress prenatally. They also suggest that coping is responsive to changing demands across pregnancy and reflective of women's characteristics, perceptions, and social situations.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 104
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]   COPING WITH STRESS - DIVERGENT STRATEGIES OF OPTIMISTS AND PESSIMISTS [J].
SCHEIER, MF ;
WEINTRAUB, JK ;
CARVER, CS .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1257-1264
[32]   OPTIMISM, COPING, AND HEALTH - ASSESSMENT AND IMPLICATIONS OF GENERALIZED OUTCOME EXPECTANCIES [J].
SCHEIER, MF ;
CARVER, CS .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 4 (03) :219-247
[33]  
Schreurs P., 1988, DUTCH UTRECHTSE COPI
[34]   Psychosocial aspects of selected issues in women's reproductive health: Current status and future directions [J].
Stanton, AL ;
Lobel, M ;
Sears, S ;
DeLuca, RS .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 70 (03) :751-770
[35]   COPING WITH A BREAST-CANCER DIAGNOSIS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
STANTON, AL ;
SNIDER, PR .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 12 (01) :16-23
[36]   THE RELATIVE EFFICACY OF AVOIDANT AND NONAVOIDANT COPING STRATEGIES - A META-ANALYSIS [J].
SULS, J ;
FLETCHER, B .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 4 (03) :249-288
[37]  
Tabachnick BG., 2013, Using multivariate statistics, V6
[38]   DETERMINANTS OF COPING - THE ROLE OF STABLE AND SITUATIONAL FACTORS [J].
TERRY, DJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 66 (05) :895-910
[39]   Coping and distress in pregnancy: an investigation of medically high risk women [J].
Yali, AM ;
Lobel, M .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 20 (01) :39-52
[40]   Stress-resistance resources and coping in pregnancy [J].
Yali, AM ;
Lobel, M .
ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING, 2002, 15 (03) :289-309