Efficacy of erector spinae plane block for analgesia in breast surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:102
|
作者
Leong, R. W. [1 ]
Tan, E. S. J. [1 ]
Wong, S. N. [2 ]
Tan, K. H. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, C. W. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Cent Lib, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Pain Med, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Duke NUS Grad Med Sch, Dept Anaesthesiol, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
acute pain; breast surgery; erector spinae plane block; paravertebral block; pectoralis nerve block; post-surgical pain; regional anaesthesia; MODIFIED RADICAL-MASTECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; CHRONIC PAIN; ANESTHESIA; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/anae.15164
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The erector spinae plane block is a new regional anaesthesia technique that provides truncal anaesthesia for breast surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to determine if the erector spinae plane block is effective at reducing pain scores and opioid consumption after breast surgery. This study also evaluated the outcomes of erector spinae plane blocks compared with other regional blocks. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. We included randomised controlled trials reporting the use of the erector spinae plane block in adult breast surgery. Risk of bias was assessed with the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to assess trial quality. Thirteen randomised controlled trials (861 patients; 418 erector spinae plane block, 215 no blocks, 228 other blocks) were included. Erector spinae plane block reduced postoperative pain compared with no block: at 0-2 hours (mean difference (95% CI) -1.63 (-2.97 to -0.29), 6 studies, 329 patients, high-quality evidence, I-2 = 98%, p = 0.02); at 6 hours (mean difference (95% CI) -0.90 (-1.49 to -0.30), 5 studies, 250 patients, high-quality evidence, I-2 = 91%, p = 0.003); at 12 hours (mean difference (95% CI) -0.46 (-0.67 to -0.25), 5 studies, 250 patients, high-quality evidence, I-2 = 58%, p < 0.0001); and at 24 hours (mean difference (95% CI) -0.50 (-0.70 to -0.30), 6 studies, 329 patients, high-quality evidence, I-2 = 76%, p < 0.00001). Compared with no block, erector spinae plane block also showed significantly lower postoperative oral morphine equivalent requirements (mean difference (95% CI) -21.55mg (-32.57 to -10.52), 7 studies, 429 patients, high-quality evidence, I-2 = 99%, p = 0.0001). Separate analysis of studies comparing erector spinae plane block with pectoralis nerve block and paravertebral block showed that its analgesic efficacy was inferior to pectoralis nerve block and similar to paravertebral block. The incidence of pneumothorax was 2.6% in the paravertebral block group; there were no reports of complications of the other blocks. This review has shown that the erector spinae plane block is more effective at reducing postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores up to 24 hours compared with general anaesthesia alone. However, it was inferior to the pectoralis nerve block and its efficacy was similar to paravertebral block. Further evidence, preferably from properly blinded trials, is required to confirm these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 413
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of analgesic effects between erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block in breast and thoracic surgery: a systemic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, Ping
    Zhao, Jian
    Zhou, Guang-zan
    Shen, Qi-hong
    Han, Qiu-wan
    SIGNA VITAE, 2025, 21 (01) : 10 - 20
  • [32] Efficacy of erector spinae plane block in pain management for patients with herpes zoster: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fujimura Jr, Alexandre Yamada
    Moura, Carolina Braga
    dos Santos, Arnaldo Bastos
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2025, 75 (02):
  • [33] Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Thoracolumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Viderman, Dmitriy
    Aubakirova, Mina
    Umbetzhanov, Yerlan
    Kulkaeva, Gulnara
    Shalekenov, S. B.
    Abdildin, Yerkin G.
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [34] Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Min-jun Liu
    Xu-yan Zhou
    Yi-bing Yao
    Xu Shen
    Rong Wang
    Qi-hong Shen
    Pain and Therapy, 2021, 10 : 333 - 347
  • [35] Erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block for postoperative pain management in thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Capuano, Paolo
    Hileman, Bethany A.
    Martucci, Gennaro
    Raffa, Giuseppe M.
    Toscano, Antonio
    Burgio, Gaetano
    Arcadipane, Antonio
    Kowalewski, Mariusz
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2023, 89 (11) : 1042 - 1050
  • [36] The erector spinae plane block for analgesia after lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review
    Rizkalla, James M.
    Holderread, Brendan
    Awad, Matthew
    Botros, Andro
    Syed, Ishaq Y.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 24 : 145 - 150
  • [37] Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Min-jun
    Zhou, Xu-yan
    Yao, Yi-bing
    Shen, Xu
    Wang, Rong
    Shen, Qi-hong
    PAIN AND THERAPY, 2021, 10 (01) : 333 - 347
  • [38] Impact of erector spinae plane block on postoperative recovery quality in spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Longyi
    Zhou, Xuelei
    Chen, Linlin
    Liu, Xianchun
    Mao, Wei
    Zhao, Li
    Li, Linji
    Xie, Ying
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, : 1877 - 1889
  • [39] Erector Spinae Plane Block for Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Qiu, Yong
    Zhang, Teng-Jiao
    Hua, Zhen
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2020, 13 : 1611 - 1619
  • [40] The Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Liu, Ling
    Zhao, Yuhua
    He, Yongpeng
    Peng, Wenli
    He, Huan
    Liang, Ling
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2023, 26 (05) : E621 - E627