Perception and reaction of Nanyang Technological University (NTU) researchers to different forms of research integrity education modality

被引:2
作者
Chua, Jolene Y. L. [1 ]
Lee, Celine S. L. [1 ]
Yeo, Kwee P. [2 ]
Ali, Yusuf [1 ]
Lim, Chin L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Phys & Math Sci, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Research integrity; Research integrity education; Research ethics; Scientific misconduct; RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT; INSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1186/s12910-022-00824-6
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Research and academic institutions use various delivery channels to deliver Research Integrity (RI) education in their communities. Yet there is no consensus on the best delivery method and the effectiveness of these channels in inculcating a positive RI culture varies across institutions. Hence, this study aimed to understand the preferences of the research community in Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. Methods An online survey was conducted on NTU research community to understand their experience with, and preference for each RI education mode offered in NTU. The RI education modes surveyed in the general ranking question are Data Management Plan (DMP) workshops, Epigeum e-Learning, Compass e-newsletter (email), and NTU policy on Research Integrity and Responsible Conduct of Research. There were 242 responses, comprising 50% research students, 32.2% research staff and 17.8% faculty members. Non-parametric statistical techniques were used to analyse preferences across different RI education modes and within sub-groups (i.e., fields, age, native language, roles in research community). Results More than 92% of respondents subscribed to the importance of RI education, but with different preferences for education modes. With respect to RI education in NTU, Compass e-newsletters were ranked the lowest (p < 0.05). Most felt that they were too wordy and unengaging, making it difficult to absorb information. Similarly, Epigeum e-Learning (p < 0.05) and 'policy' (p < 0.05) were found to be too lengthy in presentation. The compulsory NTU RI education modes (Epigeum e-learning and 'policy') enjoyed higher participation rates of 70-80% compared with 32-37% for the self-regulated modes (DMP workshop and e-newsletter). This suggests that regulatory mechanisms are still necessary to promote participation in RI education, and thus, core RI education content should be made compulsory in research/academic institutions. Although Epigeum is a compulsory course, some may not have participated in the programme due to technical issues or they might have forgotten to participate in the programme within the permissible timeframe. For all four RI education modes in NTU, the lack of awareness was among the top cited reasons for not participating. Conclusions Most NTU researchers perceived RI education positively although they may have reservations for some approaches. Conversely, e-Learning is favored over all the other modes except for the mode of Policy. Findings from this study are useful for improving the design of RI education strategies to be more appealing to the research community by enhancing user experience in terms of user-friendliness, relevance to specialisation, providing concise information and better presentation of materials For institutions with similar modes of RI education as NTU, these results may be relevant in improving participation rates and presentation of RI education modes, such as the use of infographics and more concise information.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, INT SCI RES
  • [2] Evaluating the Effects That Existing Instruction on Responsible Conduct of Research Has on Ethical Decision Making
    Antes, Alison L.
    Wang, Xiaoqian
    Mumford, Michael D.
    Brown, Ryan P.
    Connelly, Shane
    Devenport, Lynn D.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2010, 85 (03) : 519 - 526
  • [3] A Meta-Analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences
    Antes, Alison L.
    Murphy, Stephen T.
    Waples, Ethan P.
    Mumford, Michael D.
    Brown, Ryan P.
    Connelly, Shane
    Devenport, Lynn D.
    [J]. ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2009, 19 (05) : 379 - 402
  • [4] Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 1) - a multi-actor qualitative study on success in science
    Aubert Bonn, Noemie
    Pinxten, Wim
    [J]. RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW, 2021, 6 (01)
  • [5] Commentary: Perverse Incentives or Rotten Apples?
    Bouter, Lex M.
    [J]. ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2015, 22 (03): : 148 - 161
  • [6] George Stephen L, 2015, Clin Investig (Lond), V5, P161, DOI 10.4155/cli.14.116
  • [7] Hooper M, 2018, RES INTEGR PEER REV, V3, DOI 10.1186/s41073-018-0046-2
  • [8] *I MED, 2002, INT SCI RES CREAT EN
  • [9] USE OF RANKS IN ONE-CRITERION VARIANCE ANALYSIS
    KRUSKAL, WH
    WALLIS, WA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1952, 47 (260) : 583 - 621
  • [10] Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study
    Labib, Krishma
    Evans, Natalie
    Roje, Rea
    Kavouras, Panagiotis
    Elizondo, Andrea Reyes
    Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang
    Buljan, Ivan
    Ravn, Tine
    Widdershoven, Guy
    Bouter, Lex
    Charitidis, Costas
    Sorensen, Mads P.
    Tijdink, Joeri
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2022, 49 (02) : 246 - 266