Nature-based solutions as discursive tools and contested practices in urban nature's neoliberalisation processes

被引:111
作者
Kotsila, Panagiota [1 ,2 ]
Anguelovski, Isabelle [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Baro, Francesc [1 ,2 ]
Langemeyer, Johannes [1 ,2 ]
Sekulova, Filka [1 ,2 ]
Connolly, James J. T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Environm Sci & Technol ICTA, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Hosp del Mar Med Res Inst IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Catalan Inst Res & Adv Studies ICREA, Barcelona, Spain
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Nature-based solutions; urban greening; nature's neoliberalisation; urban planning; sustainability; discourse analysis; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SUSTAINABILITY FIX; POLITICAL ECOLOGY; GOVERNANCE; GARDENS; CITIZEN; POLICY; CITIES; SPACE; CITY;
D O I
10.1177/2514848620901437
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
'Nature-based solutions' is the new jargon used to promote ideas of urban sustainability, which is gaining traction in both academic and policy circles, especially in the European Union. Through an analysis of the definitions and discourse around nature-based solutions, we discern a number of assumptions stemming from positivist science that are embedded in the term, and which we find create an inviting space for nature's neoliberalisation processes. We provide empirical analysis of how these assumptions realise in two city-initiated projects in Barcelona, Spain, that have been identified as nature-based solutions: the green corridor of Passeig de Sant Joan and the community garden of Espai Germanetes supported under the municipal Pla Buits scheme. Both projects were born in a neoliberal political climate, but their outcomes in terms of neoliberalism and its contestation were very distinct - not least because of the different forms of governance and socio-natural interaction that these two projects foster. Urban nature can serve elite economic players at the expense of widespread socio-ecological benefits. But it can also serve as a ground for the articulation of demands for open and participatory green spaces that go beyond precarious and controlled stewardship for, or market-mediated interactions with, urban nature. We urge for future research and practice on nature-based solutions to be more critical of the term itself, and to guide its instrumentalisation in urban planning away from neoliberal agendas and towards more emancipatory and just socio-ecological futures.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 274
页数:23
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]  
Anguelovski I, 2014, NEIGHBORHOOD REFUGE
[2]  
Anguelovski I., 2018, City, V22, P417, DOI DOI 10.1080/13604813.2018.1473126
[3]   Assessing green gentrification in historically disenfranchised neighborhoods: a longitudinal and spatial analysis of Barcelona [J].
Anguelovski, Isabelle ;
Connolly, James J. T. ;
Masip, Laia ;
Pearsall, Hamil .
URBAN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 39 (03) :458-491
[4]   Healthy Food Stores, Greenlining and Food Gentrification: Contesting New Forms of Privilege, Displacement and Locally Unwanted Land Uses in Racially Mixed Neighborhoods [J].
Anguelovski, Isabelle .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 39 (06) :1209-1230
[5]   The 'Environmentalism of the Poor' revisited: Territory and place in disconnected glocal struggles [J].
Anguelovski, Isabelle ;
Martinez Alier, Joan .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 102 :167-176
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, BARC GREEN INFR BIOD
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2019, GUARDIAN
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities: final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on 'Nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities, DOI [10.2777/765301, DOI 10.2777/765301]
[10]  
Bakker K., 2015, The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology, P446