The effect of processing on Pisum sativum L. biofortified with sodium selenate

被引:14
|
作者
Poblaciones, Maria J. [1 ,2 ]
Rengel, Zed [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Extremadura, Dept Agron & Forest Environm Engn, Badajoz, Spain
[2] Univ Western Australia, UWA Sch Agr & Environm, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
agronomic biofortification; foliar fertilization; legumes; selenium; SELENIUM BIOFORTIFICATION; MEDITERRANEAN CONDITIONS; WINTER-WHEAT; GRAIN; SPECIATION; NUTRIENT; SULFUR; YIELD;
D O I
10.1002/jpln.201800251
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Biofortification of edible grains with selenium (Se) is widely practiced, but there is little information regarding the effects of grain processing on Se concentration in grain. To evaluate the potential of cooked field peas (Pisum sativum L.) to be used in the Se biofortification programs, foliar Na2SeO4 applications of 0, 0.015, 0.03, 0.045, 0.06, and 0.075% (w/v) were tested. Shoot growth was not influenced by the Se treatments, whereas root growth, nodulation, and 100-grain weight were increased. There was a strong linear relationship between the Se treatment dose and total Se concentration in both raw and cooked peas. For each percentage-point increase in the applied Na2SeO4 concentration, the grain Se concentration increased by 177 and 159 mu g Se kg(-1) DW in raw and cooked peas, respectively. Processing (freezing and cooking) caused a decrease of about 12% in grain Se concentration. Foliar application of 0.06% (w/v) Na2SeO4 could be a good option for biofortifying field peas. The consumption of 100 g of cooked, biofortified field peas would provide approximate to 50% of the 200 mu g total Se recommended for human daily intake.
引用
收藏
页码:932 / 937
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of different levels of urea and sodium selenate on the morphophysiological characteristics of garlic (Allium sativum L.)
    Amerian, Masoomeh
    KhoramiVafa, Mahmud
    Palangi, Amir
    Gohari, Gholamreza
    Ntatsi, Georgia
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2024, 337
  • [2] Separate foliar sodium selenate and zinc oxide application enhances Se but not Zn accumulation in pea (Pisum sativum L.) seeds
    Malka, Maksymilian
    Du Laing, Gijs
    Li, Jun
    Bohn, Torsten
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [3] Characteristics and Suitability of Some Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Varieties for Processing
    Jovicevic, D.
    Gvozdanovic-Varga, J.
    Vasic, M.
    Jokanovic, M. R.
    Tepic, A. N.
    IV BALKAN SYMPOSIUM ON VEGETABLES AND POTATOES, 2009, 830 : 83 - 89
  • [4] THE EFFECT OF SYMBIOTIC ASSOCIATIONS ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF VICIA FABA L. AND PISUM SATIVUM L.
    Dubova, Laila
    Alsina, Ina
    Strauta, Liene
    Karlovska, Amanda
    Senberga, Alise
    Nordic View to Sustainable Rural Development, 2015, : 111 - 111
  • [5] Effect of exogenous flavonoids on nodulation of pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Novák, K
    Chovanec, P
    Skrdleta, V
    Kropácová, M
    Lisá, L
    Nemcová, M
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2002, 53 (375) : 1735 - 1745
  • [6] Alkylresorcinol homologs in Pisum sativum L. varieties
    Zarnowski, R
    Kozubek, A
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR NATURFORSCHUNG SECTION C-A JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES, 1999, 54 (1-2): : 44 - 48
  • [7] Enhanced accumulation of phenolics in pea (Pisum sativum L.) seeds upon foliar application of selenate or zinc oxide
    Malka, Maksymilian
    Du Laing, Gijs
    Kuresova, Gabriela
    Hegedusova, Alzbeta
    Bohn, Torsten
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2023, 10
  • [8] THE INFLUENCE OF SLOW CLINOROTATION PISUM SATIVUM L.
    Talalaev, O. S.
    SPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-KOSMICNA NAUKA I TEHNOLOGIA, 2007, 13 (02): : 53 - 56
  • [9] Biofortification of pea (Pisum sativum L.): a review
    Guindon, Maria Fernanda
    Cazzola, Federico
    Palacios, Tatiana
    Gatti, Ileana
    Bermejo, Carolina
    Cointry, Enrique
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2021, 101 (09) : 3551 - 3563
  • [10] The effect of cocultivation treatments on transformation efficiency in pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Lenka Švábová
    Miroslav Griga
    Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 2008, 95 : 293 - 304