Breast Density Assessment Using Breast Tomosynthesis Images

被引:4
作者
Timberg, Pontus [1 ]
Fieselmann, Andreas [2 ]
Dustler, Magnus [1 ]
Petersson, Hannie [1 ]
Sartor, Hanna [3 ]
Lang, Kristina [4 ]
Fornvik, Daniel [1 ]
Zackrisson, Sophia [3 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Translat Med, Med Radiat Phys, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany
[3] Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Translat Med, Med Radiol, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[4] Unilabs AB, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
来源
BREAST IMAGING, IWDM 2016 | 2016年 / 9699卷
关键词
Breast density; BI-RADS; Mammography; Breast tomosynthesis; MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY; CANCER RISK;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_26
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this work we evaluate an approach for breast density assessment of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) data using the central projection image. A total of 348 random cases (both FFDM CC and MLO views and DBT MLO views) were collected using a Siemens Mammomat Inspiration tomosynthesis unit at Unilabs, Malmo. The cases underwent both BI-RADS 5th Edition labeling by radiologists and automated volumetric breast density analysis (VBDA) by an algorithm. Preliminary results showed an observed agreement of 70 % (weighted Kappa, kappa = 0.73) between radiologists and VBDA using FFDM images and 63 % (kappa = 0.62) for radiologists and VBDA using DBT images. Comparison between densities for FFDM and DBT resulted in high correlation (r = 0.94) and an observed agreement of 72 % (kappa = 0.76). The automated analysis is a promising approach using low dose central projection DBT images in order to get radiologist- like density ratings similar to results obtained from FFDM.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 202
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Reliability of Automated Breast Density Measurements [J].
Alonzo-Proulx, Olivier ;
Mawdsley, Gordon E. ;
Patrie, James T. ;
Yaffe, Martin J. ;
Harvey, Jennifer A. .
RADIOLOGY, 2015, 275 (02) :366-376
[2]   Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Guo, Helen ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Sun, Limei ;
Stone, Jennifer ;
Fishell, Eve ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Hislop, Greg ;
Chiarelli, Anna ;
Minkin, Salomon ;
Yaffe, Martin J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (03) :227-236
[3]   Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Yaffe, Martin J. ;
Minkin, Salomon .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (06)
[4]  
D'Orsi C. J., 2013, ACR BI RADS ATLAS BR, P141
[5]  
Fieselmann A., 2016, IWDM P
[6]  
Highnam R, 2010, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6136, P342, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_46
[7]   Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study [J].
Lang, Kristina ;
Andersson, Ingvar ;
Rosso, Aldana ;
Tingberg, Anders ;
Timberg, Pontus ;
Zackrisson, Sophia .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (01) :184-190
[8]  
Lau S. K. H. N., 2015, WORLD C MED PHYS BIO
[9]   Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis [J].
McCormack, Valerie A. ;
Silva, Isabel dos Santos .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (06) :1159-1169
[10]  
Sartor H., 2016, EUR RADIOL, P1