Quality of life after treatment for localized prostate cancer: Differences based on treatment modality

被引:119
|
作者
Davis, JW [1 ]
Kuban, DA
Lynch, DF
Schellhammer, PF
机构
[1] Sentara Canc Inst, Dept Urol, Norfolk, VA USA
[2] Sentara Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Norfolk, VA USA
[3] Sentara Canc Inst, Virginia Prostate Ctr, Norfolk, VA USA
[4] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Norfolk, VA 23501 USA
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; quality of life; questionnaires;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65870-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Brachytherapy with (103)palladium ((103) Pd) is an increasingly administered treatment modality for localized prostate cancer. We compared general and disease specific health related quality of life after Pd-103 treatment, radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy given during the same time frame. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional survey study of patients treated at a single community medical center between 1995 and 1999. We mailed 5 validated health related quality of life survey instruments to 269, 142 and 222 men who underwent radical prostatectomy, Pd-103 treatment and external beam radiation therapy, respectively, with a response rate of greater than 80% in all groups. Results: General health related quality of life assessed by the SF-36 showed the same scores in patients who underwent prostatectomy and Pd-103 treatment. The University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index was used to assess bowel, urinary and sexual function/bothersomeness. External beam radiation therapy reported was associated with worse bowel function and greater bowel bothersomeness. Prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary function compared to Pd-103 and external beam radiation therapy. Prostatectomy was associated with worse sexual function than Pd-103 or external beam radiation therapy, although nerve sparing surgery and erectile aids minimized the difference. American Urological Association symptom scores were initially higher for Pd-103 but became equal to those in the other groups in patients treated greater than 12 months from survey time. Disease-free men who underwent prostatectomy and Pd-103 brachytherapy were equally confident that cancer would not recur in the future. Satisfaction rates were equivalent and biochemical failure significantly decreased satisfaction in all groups. Conclusions: While general health related quality of life was mostly unaffected by the 3 most common treatments for prostate cancer, there were differences in bowel, urinary and sexual function. This information may aid patients in the decision making process.
引用
收藏
页码:947 / 952
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of tumor staging and treatment modality on functional outcome and quality of life after treatment for laryngeal cancer
    Robertson, Stuart M.
    Yeo, Justin C. L.
    Sabey, Lesley
    Young, David
    MacKenzie, Kenneth
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2013, 35 (12): : 1759 - 1763
  • [22] Five-year follow-up of health-related quality of life after primary treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Korfage, IJ
    Essink-Bot, ML
    Borsboom, GJJM
    Madalinska, JB
    Kirkels, WJ
    Habbema, JDF
    Schröder, FH
    de Koning, HJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 116 (02) : 291 - 296
  • [23] Functional Outcomes After Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment
    Al Hussein Al Awamlh, Bashir
    Wallis, Christopher J. D.
    Penson, David F.
    Huang, Li-Ching
    Zhao, Zhiguo
    Conwill, Ralph
    Talwar, Ruchika
    Morgans, Alicia K.
    Goodman, Michael
    Hamilton, Ann S.
    Wu, Xiao-Cheng
    Paddock, Lisa E.
    Stroup, Antoinette
    O'Neil, Brock B.
    Koyama, Tatsuki
    Hoffman, Karen E.
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 331 (04): : 302 - 317
  • [24] From bad to worse: comorbidity severity and quality of life after treatment for early-stage prostate cancer
    T J Daskivich
    L V van de Poll-Franse
    L Kwan
    N Sadetsky
    D M Stein
    M S Litwin
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2010, 13 : 320 - 327
  • [25] From bad to worse: comorbidity severity and quality of life after treatment for early-stage prostate cancer
    Daskivich, T. J.
    van de Poll-Franse, L. V.
    Kwan, L.
    Sadetsky, N.
    Stein, D. M.
    Litwin, M. S.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2010, 13 (04) : 320 - 327
  • [26] Treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Vallancien, Guy
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    Rozet, Francois
    Barret, Eric
    BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2008, 192 (05): : 1021 - 1026
  • [27] Quality of life for men receiving a second treatment for prostate cancer
    Arredondo, Shelley A.
    Latini, David M.
    Sadetsky, Natalia
    Kawakami, Jun
    Pasta, David J.
    DuChane, Janeen
    Carroll, Peter R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (01) : 273 - 278
  • [28] The Effect of Cancer Stage and Treatment Modality on Quality of Life in Oropharyngeal Cancer
    Oates, Justine
    Davies, Sarah
    Roydhouse, Jessica K.
    Fethney, Judith
    White, Kate
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2014, 124 (01) : 151 - 158
  • [29] Quality of Life After Open or Robotic Prostatectomy, Cryoablation or Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Malcolm, John B.
    Fabrizio, Michael D.
    Barone, Bethany B.
    Given, Robert W.
    Lance, Raymond S.
    Lynch, Donald F.
    Davis, John W.
    Shaves, Mark E.
    Schellhammer, Paul F.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (05) : 1822 - 1828
  • [30] Quality of life more than 10 years after radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer—impact of time after treatment and prescription dose
    Michael Pinkawa
    Amr Gharib
    Marsha Schlenter
    Ludmila Timm
    Michael J. Eble
    Quality of Life Research, 2021, 30 : 437 - 443