Why and how do think tanks expand their networks in times of crisis? The case of Bruegel and the Centre for European Policy Studies

被引:17
作者
Coman, Ramona [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Polit Sci, Inst European Studies, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Bruegel; CEPS; Economic and Monetary Union (EMU); eurozone crisis; expert knowledge; networks; think tanks; KNOWLEDGE; IDEAS; POWER;
D O I
10.1080/13501763.2017.1415953
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The eurozone crisis has spectacularly increased the European Union's (EU's) institutional demand for expert knowledge. While the crisis has challenged the legitimacy of the EU in many ways, it has in contrast amplified the visibility and the role of Brussels-based think tanks as laboratories of ideas that think ahead about eurozone governance and policies. Drawing on the analysis of more than 450 expert reports produced by two leading Brussels-based think tanks, over 300 CVs and biographical notes as well interviews, this article explores when, how and why Brussels-based think tanks expand their networks in times of crisis. While the article leaves aside the question of their ideational impact upon agenda-setting and the policy formulation process leading to the new European economic governance, it shows how think tanks adapt to crises and how they seek to have a voice in thinking about the future of the EU's economic governance.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 301
页数:16
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Austerity versus Stimulus? Understanding Fiscal Policy Change at the International Monetary Fund Since the Great Recession [J].
Ban, Cornel .
GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 2015, 28 (02) :167-183
[2]   The political functions of expert knowledge: knowledge and legitimation in European Union immigration policy [J].
Boswell, Christina .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2008, 15 (04) :471-488
[3]  
Boucher S., 2004, STUDIES AND RES
[4]  
Bruegel, 2012, ANN REPORT, P19
[5]  
Campbell J. L., 2014, ORIGINS POLICY IDEAS
[6]   Moral Economese of Scale? Crisis, Discursive Change and the Varying Authority of Economists [J].
Campbell-Verduyn, Malcolm .
GLOBAL SOCIETY, 2016, 30 (04) :507-530
[7]   Power through, over and in ideas: conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism [J].
Carstensen, Martin B. ;
Schmidt, Vivien A. .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2016, 23 (03) :318-337
[8]  
Georgakakis M., 2013, FIELD EUROCRACY
[9]   When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process [J].
Haas, PM .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2004, 11 (04) :569-592
[10]   The Bocconi boys go to Brussels: Italian economic ideas, professional networks and European austerity [J].
Helgadottir, Oddny .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2016, 23 (03) :392-409