Psychometric evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function and Pain Interference Computer Adaptive Test for subacromial impingement syndrome

被引:12
|
作者
Strong, Benjamin [1 ]
Maloney, Michael [1 ]
Baumhauer, Judith [1 ]
Schaffer, Joseph [1 ]
Houck, Jeff R. [1 ]
Hung, Man [2 ]
Bounsanga, Jerry [2 ]
Voss, Maren W. [2 ]
Gu, Yushan [2 ]
Voloshin, Ilya [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Orthopaed, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
PROMIS; CAT; physical function; pain interference; shoulder diagnoses; ASES; FUNCTION ITEM BANK; AMERICAN SHOULDER; UPPER EXTREMITY; VALIDITY; FOOT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.024
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) was previously validated for rotator cuff disease and shoulder instability. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) CAT, PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) CAT, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Function Score for subacromial impingement syndrome. Methods: PROMIS PF CAT, PI CAT, and ASES (Pain, Function, Total) were collected on all visits for 2 surgeons between January 2016 and August 2016. New patients, aged 18 years and older, were selected by International Classification of Diseases code for impingement syndrome of the shoulder. The mean number of questions answered determined efficiency. Person-item maps were created to determine ceiling and floor effects as well as person reliability. Convergent validity was determined by comparison of PROMIS domains to ASES scores with Pearson correlations. Results: For PROMIS PF CAT, the mean number of items answered was 4.54 (range 4-12). The ceiling effect was 1.56%, and the floor effect was 3.13%. The person reliability was 0.94. Pearson correlation coefficients between the PF CAT and ASES were 0.664 (ASES Function), 0.426 (ASES Pain), and 0.649 (ASES Total). For PROMIS PI CAT, the mean number of items answered was 4.27 (range 3-11). The ceiling effect was 4.69%, and the floor effect was 8.33%. The person reliability was 0.92. Pearson correlation coefficients between the PI CAT and ASES were: 0.667 (ASES Function), 0.594 (ASES Pain), and 0.729 (ASES Total). Conclusions: The psychometric properties of PROMIS PF and PI CATs were favorable for subacromial impingement syndrome. (C) 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 329
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function and pain interference in spine surgery
    Khalifeh, Jawad M.
    Dibble, Christopher F.
    Hawesli, Ammar H.
    Ray, Wilson Z.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 31 (02) : 165 - 174
  • [2] Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test
    Beckmann, James T.
    Hung, Man
    Voss, Maren W.
    Crum, Anthony B.
    Bounsanga, Jerry
    Tyser, Andrew R.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 41 (07): : 739 - U146
  • [3] Impact of Patient Demographic Factors on Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Depression Computer Adaptive Testing Scores in Patients Undergoing Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
    Meldau, Jason E.
    Borowsky, Peter
    Blanchett, Jacob
    Stephens, Jeffrey
    Muh, Stephanie
    Moutzouros, Vasilios
    Makhni, Eric C.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (11)
  • [4] The Recovery Curve for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Patient-Reported Physical Function and Pain Interference Computerized Adaptive Tests After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Kagan, Ryland
    Anderson, Mike B.
    Christensen, Jesse C.
    Peters, Christopher L.
    Gililland, Jeremy M.
    Pelt, Christopher E.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (08) : 2471 - 2474
  • [5] Development of a Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) short form for measuring physical function in geriatric rehabilitation patients
    Smit, E. B.
    Bouwstra, H.
    van der Wouden, J. C.
    Hertogh, C. M. P. M.
    Wattel, E. M.
    Roorda, L. D.
    Terwee, C. B.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (09) : 2563 - 2572
  • [6] Relationship between the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive testing and legacy instruments in patients undergoing isolated biceps tenodesis
    Lu, Yining
    Agarwalla, Avinesh
    Patel, Bhavik H.
    Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
    Baker, James D.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Forsythe, Brian
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (06) : 1214 - 1222
  • [7] Utility of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) physical function form in inflammatory myopathy
    Saygin, Didem
    Oddis, Chester V.
    Dzanko, Sedin
    Koontz, Diane
    Moghadam-Kia, Siamak
    Ardalan, Kaveh
    Coles, Theresa M.
    Aggarwal, Rohit
    SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2021, 51 (03) : 539 - 546
  • [8] Reporting and utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) measures in orthopedic research and practice: a systematic review
    Horn, Maggie E.
    Reinke, Emily K.
    Couce, Logan J.
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    Ledbetter, Leila
    George, Steven Z.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [9] Use of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for Operative Shoulder Outcomes
    Schwarz, Ilona
    Smith, John-Rudolph H.
    Houck, Darby A.
    Frank, Rachel M.
    Bravman, Jonathan T.
    McCarty, Eric C.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (06)
  • [10] Psychometric Comparison of the PROMIS Physical Function CAT With the FAAM and FFI for Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Hung, Man
    Baumhauer, Judith F.
    Brodsky, James W.
    Cheng, Christine
    Ellis, Scott J.
    Franklin, Jeremy D.
    Hon, Shirley D.
    Ishikawa, Susan N.
    Latt, L. Daniel
    Phisitkul, Phinit
    Saltzman, Charles L.
    SooHoo, Nelson F.
    Hunt, Kenneth J.
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 35 (06) : 592 - 599