Contested terrain in careers: A psychological contract model

被引:27
|
作者
Inkson, Kerr [1 ]
King, Zella [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waikato, Dept Strategy & Human Resource Management, Hamilton, New Zealand
[2] Univ Reading, Henley Business Sch, Reading RG6 2AH, Berks, England
关键词
career; career development; contested terrain; employment relations; human resource management; knowledge work; psychological contract; psychology; EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP; MANAGEMENT; CONSEQUENCES; OBLIGATIONS; OUTCOMES; BREACH; DEAL;
D O I
10.1177/0018726710384289
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In this article we extend consideration of differences of interest in employment relationships to career issues. Two sets of interests - those of employing organizations and of individual workers - often make careers 'contested terrain' in which organizations pursue strategic advantages and individuals personal advantages. The contestation is contextualized by current trends to individualized employment relations and a focus on managerial, professional and technical work. The two interest sets mirror a disjuncture between two disciplinary bases, the 'vocational' base underpinned by psychology and the 'strategic human resource management' (SHRM) base, underpinned by economics. We develop a 'psychological contract' model, in which both individuals and organizations invest knowledge capital in the other with a view to obtaining long-term returns. We consider the implications of our analysis and model for career management by both individuals and organizations, for future research on careers, and for the interdisciplinary study of careers in an integrated 'career studies'.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 57
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The impact of the shifting pensions landscape on the psychological contract
    Gough, Orla
    Arkani, Sepideh
    PERSONNEL REVIEW, 2011, 40 (1-2) : 173 - 184
  • [32] Casually cynical or trapped? Exploring gig workers' reactions to psychological contract violation
    Saksida, Tina
    Maffie, Michael
    Mihelic, Katarina Katja
    Culiberg, Barbara
    Merkuz, Ajda
    JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024,
  • [33] The anticipatory psychological contract of management graduates: Validating a psychological contract expectations questionnaire
    Gresse, Werner G.
    Linde, Barend J.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, 2020, 23 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [34] Examining the Psychological Contract as Mediator between the Safety Behavior of Supervisors and Workers on Construction Sites
    Newaz, Mohammad Tanvi
    Davis, Peter
    Jefferies, Marcus
    Pillay, Manikam
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 146 (01)
  • [35] Millennials' Career Perspective and Psychological Contract Expectations: Does the Recession Lead to Lowered Expectations?
    De Hauw, Sara
    De Vos, Ans
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 25 (02) : 293 - 302
  • [36] A bibliometric analysis of psychological contract research: current status development and future research directions
    Kozhakhmet, Sanat
    Rofcanin, Yasin
    Nurgabdeshov, Assylbek
    Las Heras, Mireia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER, 2023, 44 (05) : 918 - 935
  • [37] Psychological contract in the volunteer youth sport coach environment: the community sport club perspective
    Harman, Alanna
    Doherty, Alison
    MANAGING SPORT AND LEISURE, 2019, 24 (05) : 321 - 338
  • [38] A new look at the psychological contract during organizational socialization: The role of newcomers' obligations at entry
    Delobbe, Nathalie
    Cooper-Thomas, Helena D.
    De Hoe, Roxane
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2016, 37 (06) : 845 - 867
  • [39] A Sensemaking Model of Employee Evaluation of Psychological Contract Fulfillment When and How Do Employees Respond to Change?
    Chaudhry, Anjali
    Wayne, Sandy J.
    Schalk, Rene
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2009, 45 (04) : 498 - 520
  • [40] A dynamic phase model of psychological contract processes
    Rousseau, Denise M.
    Hansen, Samantha D.
    Tomprou, Maria
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2018, 39 (09) : 1081 - 1098