Environmental appraisal and environmental policy in the European Union

被引:26
作者
Pearce, DW [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, CSERGE, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
cost-benefit analysis; environmental policy; precautionary principle; risk assessment; sustainable development;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008207715184
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Revisions to the European Treaty of Union require some form of environmental appraisal - primarily risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis - of regulatory initiatives by the European Commission. A retrospective look at the emergence of environmental appraisal also shows that, while the Commission has made great advances in introducing cost-benefit or cost-effectiveness appraisals in recent years, past environmental decisions and overall environmental policy have not been informed by systematic appraisal techniques. Nor is it clear what role is now being played by risk assessments. While it is impossible to gauge the extent to which systematic appraisal procedures will save on regulatory and compliance expenditures, some indications are provided of the costs of past neglect of these procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 501
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
*AEA TECHN, 1996, EC EV DRAFT INC DIR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 9636 RES FUT
[3]  
BOLT C, 1993, COST QUALITY ESTABLI
[4]  
*CSERGE EFTEC EC E, 1997, COST BEN AN DIFF MUN
[5]  
*CSERGE EFTEC WARR, 1993, EXT LANDF INC
[6]  
*EUR COMM, 1992, 5 ENV ACT PROGR SUST
[7]  
*EUR PARL COUNC, 1994, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN, V37
[8]   Determinants of individuals' willingness to pay for perceived reductions in environmental health risks: a case study of bathing water quality [J].
Georgiou, S ;
Langford, IH ;
Bateman, IJ ;
Turner, RK .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1998, 30 (04) :577-594
[9]  
HOLLAND M, 1997, BENEFITS ACIDIFICATI
[10]  
*IVM NILU IIASA FR, 1998, EC EV AIR QUAL SULPH