Factors Important to Patients' Quality of Life at the End of Life

被引:232
作者
Zhang, Baohui
Nilsson, Matthew E.
Prigerson, Holly G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Ctr Psychosocial Epidemiol & Outcomes Res, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Div Populat Sci, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
ADVANCED CANCER-PATIENTS; CARE NEAR-DEATH; MENTAL-HEALTH; TREATMENT PREFERENCES; BEREAVED CAREGIVERS; INITIAL VALIDATION; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; MEDICAL-CARE; ILL PATIENTS; ASSOCIATIONS;
D O I
10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2364
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: When curative treatments are no longer options for patients dying of cancer, the focus of care often turns from prolonging life to promoting quality of life (QOL). Few data exist on what predicts better QOL at the end of life (EOL) for advanced cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors that most influence QOL at the EOL, thereby identifying promising targets for interventions to promote QOL at the EOL. Methods: Coping With Cancer is a US multisite, prospective, longitudinal cohort study of 396 advanced cancer patients and their informal caregivers who were enrolled from September 1, 2002, through February 28, 2008. Patients were followed up from enrollment to death a median of 4.1 months later. Patient QOL in the last week of life was a primary outcome of Coping With Cancer and the present report. Results: The following set of 9 factors, preceded by a sign indicating the direction of the effect and presented in rank order of importance, explained the most variance in patients' QOL at the EOL: 1 = (-) intensive care unit stays in the final week (explained 4.4% of the variance in QOL at the EOL), 2 = (-) hospital deaths (2.7%), 3 = (-) patient worry at baseline (2.7%), 4 = ( +) religious prayer or meditation at baseline (2.5%), 5 = site of cancer care (1.8%), 6 = (-) feeding-tube use in the final week (1.1%), 7 = (+) pastoral care within the hospital or clinic (1.0%), 8 = (-) chemotherapy in the final week (0.8%), and 9 = (+) patient-physician therapeutic alliance at baseline (0.7%). The vast majority of the variance in QOL at the EOL, however, remained unexplained. Conclusion: Advanced cancer patients who avoid hospitalizations and the intensive care unit, who are less worried, who pray or meditate, who are visited by a pastor in the hospital/clinic, and who feel a therapeutic alliance with their physicians have the highest QOL at the EOL.
引用
收藏
页码:1133 / 1142
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1995, Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio Causal and control beliefs, DOI DOI 10.1037/T00393-000
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, APPROACHING DEATH IM
  • [3] Atef-vahid MK, 2011, J RES MED SCI, V16, P928
  • [4] Religiousness and spiritual support among advanced cancer patients and associations with end-of-life treatment preferences and quality of life
    Balboni, Tracy A.
    Vanderwerker, Lauren C.
    Block, Susan D.
    Paulk, M. Elizabeth
    Lathan, Christopher S.
    Peteet, John R.
    Prigerson, Holly G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (05) : 555 - 560
  • [5] Provision of Spiritual Care to Patients With Advanced Cancer: Associations With Medical Care and Quality of Life Near Death
    Balboni, Tracy Anne
    Paulk, Mary Elizabeth
    Balboni, Michael J.
    Phelps, Andrea C.
    Loggers, Elizabeth Trice
    Wright, Alexi A.
    Block, Susan D.
    Lewis, Eldrin F.
    Peteet, John R.
    Prigerson, Holly Gwen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (03) : 445 - 452
  • [6] Engagement of patients in religious and spiritual practices: Confirmatory results with the SpREUK-P 1.1 questionnaire as a tool of quality of life research
    Büssing A.
    Matthiessen P.F.
    Ostermann T.
    [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3 (1)
  • [7] You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: Consider the brief COPE
    Carver, CS
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1997, 4 (01) : 92 - 100
  • [8] ASSESSING COPING STRATEGIES - A THEORETICALLY BASED APPROACH
    CARVER, CS
    SCHEIER, MF
    WEINTRAUB, JK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 56 (02) : 267 - 283
  • [9] A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    CHARLSON, ME
    POMPEI, P
    ALES, KL
    MACKENZIE, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05): : 373 - 383
  • [10] Effect of dignity therapy on distress and end-of-life experience in terminally ill patients: a randomised controlled trial
    Chochinov, Harvey Max
    Kristjanson, Linda J.
    Breitbart, William
    McClement, Susan
    Hack, Thomas F.
    Hassard, Tom
    Harlos, Mike
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2011, 12 (08) : 753 - 762