Target lesion response predicts survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma retreated with transarterial chemoembolization

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Yong-Fa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guo, Rong-Ping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
OuYang, Han-Yue [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shen, Jing-Xian [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhao, Jing [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Tan, Guo-Sheng [5 ]
Le, Yong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wei, Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shi, Ming [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary Oncol, Ctr Canc, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] State Key Lab Oncol South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Radiol, Ctr Canc, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Intervent Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
hepatocellular carcinoma; progressive disease; stage progression-free; target lesion response; transarterial chemoembolization; DECISION-MAKING; MODIFIED RECIST; MANAGEMENT; CRITERIA; REFRACTORINESS; GUIDELINES; SORAFENIB; EFFICACY; NUMBER; EASL;
D O I
10.1111/liv.13149
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & AimsThe discontinuation rules of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients who were assessed as progressive disease (PD) but stage progression-free (SP-free: still belongs to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer B) after TACE are unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the PD-pattern on the survival of these patients retreated with TACE. MethodsIn total, 115 consecutive patients who were assessed as PD but SP-free after TACE and then underwent at least one subsequent TACE session were included. Sixty patients were assessed as PD with target lesion progression (TP), and 55 patients were assessed as PD with target lesion non-progression (TNP). Survival and treatment-related adverse events were compared between the two groups. Additional external validation was performed using a data set (n = 103) from another institution. ResultsPatients with TNP had significantly longer median post-progression survival (PPS) than those with TP (21.0 vs. 11.9 months, P = 0.004). After TACE retreatment, the incidence of liver dysfunction was significantly higher for patients with TP than for patients with TNP (45% vs. 20%, P = 0.031). In the multivariate analysis, the target lesion response was one of the most significant prognostic factors for PPS (HR = 2.01; 95% confidence interval: 1.23-3.27; P = 0.005). The findings were supported by an independent external cohort. ConclusionsCompared to patients with TNP, patients with TP might exhibit no improvement in survival and even present damaged liver function after retreatment with TACE. Target lesion response is useful as a clinical decision for repeated TACE in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1516 / 1524
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transarterial chemoembolization and sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Cabibbo, Giuseppe
    Tremosini, Silvia
    Galati, Giovanni
    Mazza, Giancarlo
    Gadaleta-Caldarola, Gennaro
    Lombardi, Giuseppe
    Antonucci, Michela
    Sacco, Rodolfo
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2014, 14 (07) : 831 - 845
  • [32] Transarterial Chemoembolization related to Good Survival for Selected Patients with advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Le, Yong
    Shen, Jing-Xian
    Zhang, Yong-Fa
    He, Min-Ke
    Kan, Anna
    Chen, Hai-Long
    Yu, Zi-Shan
    Li, Qi-Jiong
    Shi, Ming
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 10 (03): : 665 - 671
  • [33] Effectiveness of sorafenib in treating intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients refractory to transarterial chemoembolization
    Ashour, Reham
    Rewisha, Eman
    Rady, Mohamed A. K. L.
    Elkhadry, Sally Waheed
    Abdelhalim, Heba
    Atef, Mohamed
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [34] Contrast enhanced ultrasonography in assessing the treatment response to transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
    Sparchez, Zeno
    Mocan, Tudor
    Radu, Pompilia
    Anton, Ofelia
    Comsa, Mihai
    Vasile, Tudor
    Bolog, Nicolae
    MEDICAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2016, 18 (01) : 96 - 102
  • [35] Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Why, When, How?
    Kotsifa, Evgenia
    Vergadis, Chrysovalantis
    Vailas, Michael
    Machairas, Nikolaos
    Kykalos, Stylianos
    Damaskos, Christos
    Garmpis, Nikolaos
    Lianos, Georgios D.
    Schizas, Dimitrios
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [36] Is transarterial chemoembolization beneficial for patients with diffuse infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma?
    Hung, Tsung-Hsing
    Tsai, Chen-Chi
    Lin, Chung-Chi
    Lee, Hsing-Feng
    Chu, Chi-Jen
    Lin, Han-Chieh
    HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 7 (02) : 676 - 682
  • [37] Predictors of Mortality in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization
    Barman, Pranab M.
    Sharma, Pratima
    Krishnamurthy, Venkat
    Willatt, Jonathon
    McCurdy, Heather
    Moseley, Richard H.
    Su, Grace L.
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2014, 59 (11) : 2821 - 2825
  • [38] Combined transarterial chemoembolization and tislelizumab for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
    Tan, Bin-Bin
    Fu, Ying
    Shao, Ming-Hua
    Chen, Hai-Lei
    Liu, Ping
    Fan, Chao
    Zhang, Hui
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2024, 16 (09):
  • [39] Transarterial chemoembolization combined with camrelizumab for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma
    Guo, Yusheng
    Ren, Yanqiao
    Chen, Lei
    Sun, Tao
    Zhang, Weihua
    Sun, Bo
    Zhu, Licheng
    Xiong, Fu
    Zheng, Chuansheng
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [40] Diffusion-weighted imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma before and after transarterial chemoembolization: role in survival prediction and response evaluation
    Labeur, Tim A.
    Runge, Jurgen H.
    Klompenhouwer, Elisabeth G.
    Klumpen, Heinz-Josef
    Takkenberg, R. Bart
    van Delden, Otto M.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (08) : 2740 - 2750