Shaking Table Test of a Half-Scale Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Bridge Abutment

被引:34
作者
Zheng, Yewei [1 ]
Sander, Andrew C. [1 ]
Rong, Wenyong [1 ]
Fox, Patrick J. [2 ]
Shing, P. Benson [1 ]
McCartney, John S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Struct Engn, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 212 E Coll Ave, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
来源
GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL | 2018年 / 41卷 / 01期
关键词
shaking table test; reduced-scale model; geogrid; geosynthetic-reinforced soil; bridge abutment; RETAINING WALL MODELS; DIRECT SHEAR MACHINE; SEISMIC RESPONSE; MODULAR-BLOCK; CLAY LINERS; DEFORMATION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1520/GTJ20160268
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper presents an experimental study on the dynamic response of a half-scale geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) bridge abutment system using a shaking table. Experimental design of the model specimen followed established similitude relationships for shaking table tests on reduced-scale models in a 1-g gravitational field, including scaling of model geometry, geosynthetic-reinforcement stiffness, backfill soil modulus, bridge load, and characteristics of the earthquake motions. The 2.7-m-high GRS bridge abutment was constructed using well-graded sand backfill, modular facing blocks, and uniaxial geogrid reinforcements with a vertical spacing of 0.15 m in both the longitudinal and transverse directions. A bridge beam was placed on the GRS bridge abutment at one end and on a concrete support wall resting on a sliding platform off the shaking table at the other end. The GRS bridge abutment system was subjected to a series of input motions in the longitudinal direction. Results indicate that the testing system performed well, and that the GRS bridge abutment experienced small deformations. For two earthquake motions, the maximum incremental residual facing displacement in model scale was 1.0 mm, and the average incremental residual bridge seat settlement in model scale was 1.4 mm, which corresponds to a vertical strain of 0.7 %.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 192
页数:22
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [11] Fox PJ, 1997, GEOTECH TEST J, V20, P279
  • [12] GULER E, 2014, J GEOTECH GEOENVIRON, V140, P1, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606
  • [13] Investigation of dynamic behavior of geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining structures under earthquake loads
    Guler, Erol
    Enunlu, Ali K.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2009, 7 (03) : 737 - 777
  • [14] Helwany S., 2012, NCHRP WEB ONLY DOCUM, V187, P251
  • [15] Simulating the Behavior of GRS bridge abutments
    Helwany, Sam M. B.
    Wu, Jonathan T. H.
    Kitsabunnarat, Akadet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 133 (10) : 1229 - 1240
  • [16] Howard RWA, 1998, GEOTECH SP, P446
  • [17] Iai S., 1989, Soils and Foundations, Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, V29, P105
  • [18] Khosravi A., 2010, GEOFLORIDA 2010 ADV, P410
  • [19] Shaking and tilt table tests of geosynthetic-reinforced soil and conventional-type retaining walls
    Koseki, J
    Munaf, Y
    Tatsuoka, F
    Tateyama, M
    Kojima, K
    Sato, T
    [J]. GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 5 (1-2) : 73 - 96
  • [20] Kramer S. L, 1996, GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQU, P82