Abandonment of Low-Vision Devices in an Outpatient Population

被引:32
作者
Dougherty, Bradley E. [1 ]
Kehler, K. Bradley [2 ]
Jamara, Richard [3 ]
Patterson, Nicole [4 ]
Valenti, Denise [5 ]
Vera-Diaz, Fuensanta A. [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Optometry, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Eye Inst, Nashville, TN USA
[3] New England Coll Optometry, Boston, MA USA
[4] Nova SE Univ, Coll Optometry, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33314 USA
[5] Harvard Vanguard, Boston, MA USA
[6] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Schepens Eye Res Inst, Dept Ophthalmol, Boston, MA USA
关键词
low vision; rehabilitation; questionnaires; reading; visual field; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; VISUAL-FIELD DEFECTS; UNITED-STATES; REHABILITATION; PREVALENCE; VETERANS; GLAUCOMA; OUTCOMES; ADULTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/OPX.0b013e31822a61e7
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To investigate abandonment rate of prescribed low-vision devices for near tasks and factors associated with abandonment in a U. S. outpatient population. Methods. A telephone survey was administered to 88 patients with low vision from four clinical sites about 1 year after examination and prescription of devices. Patients were surveyed on timing and frequency of use and reasons for abandonment of devices. The main outcome measure (abandonment) was defined as patient report of no use of prescribed device in the previous 3 months. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate significant vision and demographic factors related to abandonment. Results. Of 119 prescribed devices, 19% (95% CI, 12 to 26) had not been used within the previous 3 months. Mean (+/- SD) better eye visual acuity at examination was 0.61 +/- 0.29 logMAR, and mean age was 77 +/- 17 years. Mean time between device prescription and survey was 11 +/- 3 months. Device abandonment was not associated with age (p = 0.863), time since prescription (p = 0.125), visual acuity (p = 0.804), or category of magnification device (spectacle, handheld, stand, or video) (p = 0.412). There was a significant association between documented non-central visual field loss and abandonment of magnification device (p = 0.046). Repeat administration of the survey resulted in the same abandonment classification in 15 of 15 patients (100%). Conclusions. Abandonment rate was similar for this outpatient population to those previously reported in the U. S. veteran inpatient population and in other countries. Patients with visual field loss may be more likely to abandon prescribed devices. (Optom Vis Sci 2011; 88: 1283-1287)
引用
收藏
页码:1283 / 1287
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Congdon N, 2004, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V122, P477
[2]   POOR VISION AND THE ELDERLY - A DOMICILIARY STUDY [J].
ELLIOTT, AJ .
EYE, 1989, 3 :365-369
[3]  
FONDA G, 1956, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V56, P171
[4]  
GOODRICH GL, 1980, AM J OPTOM PHYS OPT, V57, P881
[5]   Influence of glaucomatous visual field loss on health-related quality of life [J].
Gutierrez, P ;
Wilson, MR ;
Johnson, C ;
Gordon, M ;
Cioffi, GA ;
Ritch, R ;
Sherwood, M ;
Meng, K ;
Mangione, CM .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 115 (06) :777-784
[6]   Evaluating the outcomes of low vision rehabilitation [J].
Harper, R ;
Doorduyn, K ;
Reeves, B ;
Slater, L .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1999, 19 (01) :3-11
[7]   Age-related macular degeneration and low-vision rehabilitation: a systematic review [J].
Hooper, Phil ;
Jutai, Jeffrey W. ;
Strong, Graham ;
Russell-Minda, Elizabeth .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2008, 43 (02) :180-187
[8]   Survey of optometric low vision rehabilitation training methods for the moderately visually impaired [J].
Kammer, Rebecca ;
Sell, Christy ;
Jamara, Richard J. ;
Kollbaum, Elti .
OPTOMETRY-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION, 2009, 80 (04) :185-192
[9]   OUTCOME OF LOW-VISION AID PROVISION - THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A LOW-VISION CLINIC [J].
LEAT, SJ ;
FRYER, A ;
RUMNEY, NJ .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1994, 71 (03) :199-206
[10]   A model of the prevalence and incidence of low vision and blindness among adults in the US [J].
Massof, RW .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2002, 79 (01) :31-38