A scoping review of risk-stratified bowel screening: current evidence, future directions

被引:17
作者
Cairns, J. M. [1 ]
Greenley, S. [1 ]
Bamidele, O. [1 ]
Weller, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Hull York Med Sch, Cottingham Rd, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7HR, N Humberside, England
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Teviot Pl, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Bowel; Colorectal; Screening; Risk-stratified; Feasibility; Acceptability; FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST; ADVANCED COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; FAMILY-HISTORY; DECISION-MAKING; CANCER; POPULATION; TOOL; COLONOSCOPY; SCORE;
D O I
10.1007/s10552-022-01568-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose In this scoping review, we examined the international literature on risk-stratified bowel screening to develop recommendations for future research, practice and policy. Methods Six electronic databases were searched from inception to 18 October 2021: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Forward and backwards citation searches were also undertaken. All relevant literature were included. Results After de-deduplication, 3,629 records remained. 3,416 were excluded at the title/abstract screening stage. A further 111 were excluded at full-text screening stage. In total, 102 unique studies were included. Results showed that risk-stratified bowel screening programmes can potentially improve diagnostic performance, but there is a lack of information on longer-term outcomes. Risk models do appear to show promise in refining existing risk stratification guidelines but most were not externally validated and less than half achieved good discriminatory power. Risk assessment tools in primary care have the potential for high levels of acceptability and uptake, and therefore, could form an important component of future risk-stratified bowel screening programmes, but sometimes the screening recommendations were not adhered to by the patient or healthcare provider. The review identified important knowledge gaps, most notably in the area of organisation of screening services due to few pilots, and what risk stratification might mean for inequalities. Conclusion We recommend that future research focuses on what organisational challenges risk-stratified bowel screening may face and a consideration of inequalities in any changes to organised bowel screening programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 685
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Ovarian cancer screening-Current status, future directions [J].
Menon, Usha ;
Griffin, Michelle ;
Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 132 (02) :490-495
[42]   Dried Fruits, Nuts, and Cancer Risk and Survival: A Review of the Evidence and Future Research Directions [J].
Bolling, Bradley W. W. ;
Aune, Dagfinn ;
Noh, Hwayoung ;
Petersen, Kristina S. S. ;
Freisling, Heinz .
NUTRIENTS, 2023, 15 (06)
[43]   Psychological support for patients with cancer: evidence review and suggestions for future directions [J].
Hulbert-Williams, Nicholas J. ;
Beatty, Lisa ;
Dhillon, Haryana M. .
CURRENT OPINION IN SUPPORTIVE AND PALLIATIVE CARE, 2018, 12 (03) :276-292
[44]   Phytol and its metabolites phytanic and pristanic acids for risk of cancer: current evidence and future directions [J].
Bobe, Gerd ;
Zhang, Zhenzhen ;
Kopp, Ryan ;
Garzotto, Mark ;
Shannon, Jackilen ;
Takata, Yumie .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2020, 29 (02) :191-200
[45]   Clinical Benefit and Cost Effectiveness of Risk-Stratified Gastric Cancer Screening Strategies in China: A Modeling Study [J].
Qin, Shuxia ;
Wang, Xuehong ;
Li, Sini ;
Tan, Chongqing ;
Zeng, Xiaohui ;
Luo, Xia ;
Yi, Lidan ;
Peng, Liubao ;
Wu, Meiyu ;
Peng, Ye ;
Wang, Liting ;
Wan, Xiaomin .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2022, 40 (07) :725-737
[46]   Cost-Effectiveness of a Serum Biomarker Test for Risk-Stratified Liver Ultrasound Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma [J].
Carter, Hannah E. ;
Jeffrey, Gary P. ;
Ramm, Grant A. ;
Gordon, Louisa G. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 (10) :1454-1462
[47]   Quercetin as a Potential Therapeutic Agent for Malignant Melanoma-A Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions [J].
Hoinoiu, Teodora ;
Dumitrascu, Victor ;
Pit, Daniel ;
Schipor, David-Alexandru ;
Jabri-Tabrizi, Madalina ;
Hoinoiu, Bogdan ;
Petreus, David Emanuel ;
Seiman, Corina .
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2025, 61 (04)
[48]   Aerobic exercise in anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: a systematic review of current evidence and future directions [J].
Chen, Joseph J. ;
Wu, Pei-Tzu ;
Middlekauff, Holly R. ;
Nguyen, Kim-Lien .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 312 (02) :H213-H222
[49]   Risk-stratified selection to colonoscopy in FIT colorectal cancer screening: development and temporal validation of a prediction model [J].
Thomsen, Mette Kielsholm ;
Pedersen, Lars ;
Erichsen, Rune ;
Lash, Timothy L. ;
Sorensen, Henrik T. ;
Mikkelsen, Ellen M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 126 (08) :1229-1235
[50]   Clarifying the Trade-Offs of Risk-Stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Study [J].
Hendrix, Nathaniel ;
Gulati, Roman ;
Jiao, Boshen ;
Kader, A. Karim ;
Ryan, Stephen T. ;
Etzioni, Ruth .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 190 (10) :2064-2074