A scoping review of risk-stratified bowel screening: current evidence, future directions

被引:13
|
作者
Cairns, J. M. [1 ]
Greenley, S. [1 ]
Bamidele, O. [1 ]
Weller, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Hull York Med Sch, Cottingham Rd, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7HR, N Humberside, England
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Teviot Pl, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Bowel; Colorectal; Screening; Risk-stratified; Feasibility; Acceptability; FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST; ADVANCED COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; FAMILY-HISTORY; DECISION-MAKING; CANCER; POPULATION; TOOL; COLONOSCOPY; SCORE;
D O I
10.1007/s10552-022-01568-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose In this scoping review, we examined the international literature on risk-stratified bowel screening to develop recommendations for future research, practice and policy. Methods Six electronic databases were searched from inception to 18 October 2021: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Forward and backwards citation searches were also undertaken. All relevant literature were included. Results After de-deduplication, 3,629 records remained. 3,416 were excluded at the title/abstract screening stage. A further 111 were excluded at full-text screening stage. In total, 102 unique studies were included. Results showed that risk-stratified bowel screening programmes can potentially improve diagnostic performance, but there is a lack of information on longer-term outcomes. Risk models do appear to show promise in refining existing risk stratification guidelines but most were not externally validated and less than half achieved good discriminatory power. Risk assessment tools in primary care have the potential for high levels of acceptability and uptake, and therefore, could form an important component of future risk-stratified bowel screening programmes, but sometimes the screening recommendations were not adhered to by the patient or healthcare provider. The review identified important knowledge gaps, most notably in the area of organisation of screening services due to few pilots, and what risk stratification might mean for inequalities. Conclusion We recommend that future research focuses on what organisational challenges risk-stratified bowel screening may face and a consideration of inequalities in any changes to organised bowel screening programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 685
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A scoping review of risk-stratified bowel screening: current evidence, future directions
    J. M. Cairns
    S. Greenley
    O. Bamidele
    D. Weller
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2022, 33 : 653 - 685
  • [2] Public acceptability and anticipated uptake of risk-stratified bowel cancer screening in the UK: An online survey
    Taylor, Lily C.
    Dennison, Rebecca A.
    Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2024, 48
  • [3] Risk-stratified strategies in population screening for colorectal cancer
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    Meester, Reinier
    de Jonge, Lucie
    Buron, Andrea
    Haug, Ulrike
    Senore, Carlo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 150 (03) : 397 - 405
  • [4] Cost-Effectiveness of Risk-Stratified Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Polygenic Risk: Current Status and Future Potential
    Naber, Steffie K.
    Kundu, Suman
    Kuntz, Karen M.
    Dotson, W. David
    Williams, Marc S.
    Zauber, Ann G.
    Calonge, Ned
    Zallen, Doris T.
    Ganiats, Theodore G.
    Webber, Elizabeth M.
    Goddard, Katrina A. B.
    Henrikson, Nora B.
    van Ballegooijen, Marjolein
    Janssens, A. Cecile J. W.
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    JNCI CANCER SPECTRUM, 2020, 4 (01)
  • [5] A discrete choice experiment to understand public preferences and priorities for risk-stratified bowel cancer screening programmes in the UK
    Dennison, Rebecca A.
    Thomas, Chloe V.
    Morris, Stephen
    Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 177
  • [6] Research in people with psychosis risk syndrome: a review of the current evidence and future directions
    Correll, Christoph U.
    Hauser, Marta
    Auther, Andrea M.
    Cornblatt, Barbara A.
    JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 51 (04) : 390 - 431
  • [7] Risk-stratified screening for the early detection of kidney cancer
    Rossi, Sabrina H.
    Harrison, Hannah
    Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
    Stewart, Grant D.
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2024, 22 (01): : E69 - E78
  • [8] Implementing Risk-Stratified Breast Screening in England: An Agenda Setting Meeting
    McWilliams, Lorna
    Evans, D. Gareth
    Payne, Katherine
    Harrison, Fiona
    Howell, Anthony
    Howell, Sacha J.
    French, David P.
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [9] Acceptability of risk-stratified population screening across cancer types: Qualitative interviews with the Australian public
    Dunlop, Kate
    Rankin, Nicole M.
    Smit, Amelia K.
    Salgado, Zofia
    Newson, Ainsley J.
    Keogh, Louise
    Cust, Anne E.
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2021, 24 (04) : 1326 - 1336
  • [10] Acceptability of risk-stratified breast screening: Effect of the order of presenting risk and benefit information
    Ghanouni, Alex
    Waller, Jo
    Stoffel, Sandro T.
    Vlaev, Ivo
    von Wagner, Christian
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2020, 27 (01) : 52 - 56