A randomised controlled trial of paracetamol and ibuprofen with or without codeine or oxycodone as initial analgesia for adults with moderate pain from limb injury

被引:26
作者
Graudins, Andis [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Meek, Robert [2 ,6 ]
Parkinson, Jacqueline [5 ,6 ]
Egerton-Warburton, Diana [3 ,6 ]
Meyer, Alastair [4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Dandenong Hosp, Emergency Med Res Unit, Monash Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Dandenong Hosp, Monash Emergency, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Med Ctr, Monash Emergency, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Casey Hosp, Monash Emergency, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Monash Med Ctr, Dept Pharm, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Sch Clin Sci, Monash Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
analgesia; emergency department; ibuprofen; opioid; paracetamol; randomised controlled trial; ACETAMINOPHEN; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.1111/1742-6723.12672
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Compare pain relief from non-opioid, codeine and oxycodone analgesic regimens in adults with moderate pain from limb injury. Method: Double-blind, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Three regimens of six tablets, each included 2 x 500 mg paracetamol and 2 x 200 mg ibuprofen with 2 x 100 mg thiamine (non-opioid), 2 x 30 mg codeine (codeine) or 2 x 5 mg oxycodone tablets (oxycodone). Primary outcome: difference in mean visual analogue scale (VAS) change between groups at 30 min, with a limit of inferiority of 13. Secondary outcomes included mean change in VAS rating from baseline to 30 min for each group, patient satisfaction, need for additional analgesia and adverse events. Pain ratings taken at 60 and 90 min for patients still in ED are described. Results: Of 182 patients randomised, non-opioid, codeine and oxycodone numbers were 61, 62 and 59. Differences (95% CI) between groups at 30 min were as follows: non-opioid versus codeine -2.6 (-8.8 to 3.6); non-opioid versus oxycodone -2.7 (-9.3 to 3.9); codeine versus oxycodone 0.1 (-6.6 to 6.4). Mean VAS reductions for non-opioid, codeine and oxycodone were -13.5, -16.1 and -16.2 mm, respectively. Satisfaction with analgesia was reported by 77.6% (64.7-87.5), 81.0% (67.2-89.0) and 73.6% (59.7-84.7) and adverse events by 3.3% (0.4-11.3), 1.6% (0.4-8.7) and 16.9% (8.4-29.0), respectively. Mean VAS reductions at 60 and 90 min were as follows: -23.2 and -18.7 mm for non-opioid; -30.7 and -33.3 mm for codeine; and -26.1 and -31.7 mm for oxycodone. Conclusion: At 30 min, analgesic effects of non-opioid, codeine and oxycodone groups were non-inferior.
引用
收藏
页码:666 / 672
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, JOINT POL EM DEP PAI
  • [2] Randomized Clinical Trial of Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Versus Codeine/Acetaminophen in the Treatment of Acute Extremity Pain After Emergency Department Discharge
    Chang, Andrew K.
    Bijur, Polly E.
    Munjal, Kevin G.
    Gallagher, E. John
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 21 (03) : 227 - 235
  • [3] A randomized, controlled trial of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and codeine for acute pain relief in children with musculoskeletal trauma
    Clark, Eric
    Plint, Amy C.
    Correll, Rhonda
    Gaboury, Isabelle
    Passi, Brett
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2007, 119 (03) : 460 - 467
  • [4] Davies J, 2002, AUSTRALAS EMERG NURS, V5, P30
  • [5] Single dose oral ibuprofen for acute postoperative pain in adults
    Derry, C.
    Derry, S.
    Moore, R. A.
    McQuay, H. J.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (03):
  • [6] Derry CJ, 2012, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
  • [7] Derry S, 2012, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
  • [8] Derry S, 2012, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
  • [9] Single dose oral oxycodone and oxycodone plus paracetamol (acetaminophen) for acute postoperative pain in adults
    Gaskell, H.
    Derry, S.
    Moore, R. A.
    McQuay, H. J.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (03):
  • [10] The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain
    Kelly, AM
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2001, 18 (03) : 205 - 207