Spinal perimedullary vein enlargement sign: an added value for the differentiation between intradural-extramedullary and intramedullary tumors on magnetic resonance imaging

被引:2
作者
Gong, Tao [1 ]
Liu, Yubo [2 ]
Wang, Guangbin [1 ]
Yang, Li [3 ]
Chen, Weibo [4 ]
Gao, Fei [1 ]
Chen, Xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Dept Shandong Med Imaging, Res Inst, Jinan 250000, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Dept Radiol, Prov Hosp Affiliated, Jinan, Peoples R China
[3] Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Radiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Philips Healthcare, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Spinal cord tumors; Vein enlargement; Intradural-extramedullar; Intramedullary; MR imaging; DURAL ARTERIOVENOUS-FISTULA; HEMANGIOBLASTOMAS; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00234-016-1744-4
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine the added value of the perimedullary spinal vein enlargement sign on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in distinguishing intradural-extramedullary tumors (IDEMTs) from intramedullary spinal tumors (IMTs). Two hundred and eight consecutive spinal intradural tumors with histopathologic confirmation (21 IMTs, 187 IDEMTs) were enrolled. Two readers blinded to the final pathological diagnosis and clinical data independently assessed the venous enlargement sign to determine the agreement between them and jointly distinguished IDEMTs from IMTs according to the common MRI findings. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of IDEMTs were calculated for the common MRI findings, vein enlargement sign, and a combination of both. Intraobserver agreement and interobserver agreement for both readers was excellent. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of common MRI findings for differentiating IDEMTs from IMTs were 83.4, 95.2, and 89.3 %, respectively. Thirty-one IDEMTs were mistakenly diagnosed as IMTs, in which seven were cases with vein enlargement signs. By applying the vein enlargement sign to the common MRI findings, the specificity remained at 95.2 %, while the sensitivity improved to 89.3 % and the accuracy increased to 92.3 %. The spinal perimedullary vein enlargement sign is useful in assessing intradural tumors and to differentiate IDEMTs from IMTs.
引用
收藏
页码:1117 / 1124
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Agarwal Vijay, 2014, Neurosurg Focus, V37, P1, DOI 10.3171/2014.V2.FOCUS14180
[2]   PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF SPINAL VASCULAR MALFORMATIONS [J].
AMINOFF, MJ ;
BARNARD, RO ;
LOGUE, V .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1974, 23 (02) :255-263
[3]   Differentiation of Spinal Schwannomas and Myxopapillary Ependymomas MR Imaging and Pathologic Features [J].
Ando, Kei ;
Imagama, Shiro ;
Ito, Zenya ;
Hirano, Kenichi ;
Tauchi, Ryoji ;
Muramoto, Akio ;
Matsui, Hiroki ;
Matsumoto, Tomohiro ;
Sakai, Yoshihito ;
Matsuyama, Yukihiro ;
Ishiguro, Naoki .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2014, 27 (02) :105-110
[4]   Spinal cord tumors [J].
Balériaux, DLF .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (07) :1252-1258
[5]   Cranial dural arteriovenous shunts. Part 3. Classification based on the leptomeningeal venous drainage [J].
Baltsavias, Gerasimos ;
Roth, Peter ;
Valavanis, Anton .
NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2015, 38 (02) :273-281
[6]   Extramedullary Intradural Spinal Tumors: A Pictorial Review [J].
Beall, Douglas P. ;
Googe, David J. ;
Emery, Robert L. ;
Thompson, Darin B. ;
Campbell, Scot E. ;
Ly, Justin Q. ;
DeLone, David ;
Smirniotopoulos, James ;
Lisanti, Chris ;
Currie, T. Jenks .
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 36 (05) :185-198
[7]  
Burtis MT, 2005, AM J NEURORADIOL, V26, P34
[8]  
Caplan Justin M, 2014, Neurosurg Focus, V37 Suppl 2, P13, DOI 10.3171/2014.V3.FOCUS14376
[9]   Adult Primary Intradural Spinal Cord Tumors: A Review [J].
Chamberlain, Marc C. ;
Tredway, Trent L. .
CURRENT NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE REPORTS, 2011, 11 (03) :320-328
[10]  
Chu BC, 2001, AM J NEURORADIOL, V22, P206