Periareolar endoscopic minimally invasive cardiac surgery: postoperative scar assessment analysis

被引:10
作者
Van Praet, Karel M. [1 ]
Kofler, Markus [1 ]
Akansel, Serdar [1 ]
Montagner, Matteo [1 ]
Meyer, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Suendermann, Simon H. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Falk, Volkmar [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Kempfert, Joerg [1 ]
机构
[1] German Heart Ctr Berlin, Dept Cardiothorac & Vasc Surg, Augustenburger Pl 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[2] Berlin Inst Hlth, Berlin, Germany
[3] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Berlin, Germany
[4] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[5] Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany
[6] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Translat Med, Dept Hlth Sci & Technol, Translat Cardiovasc Technol, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Cardiac surgery; Minimally invasive; Endoscopic; Periareolar approach; Mitral valve; PATIENT; THYROIDECTOMY; CLOSURE; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1093/icvts/ivac200
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: The standard approach for minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) for repair of the atrioventricular valves is a right lateral minithoracotomy. In this study, we report our experience with a periareolar endoscopic approach, which aims at an optimal cosmetic outcome while preserving optimal clinical outcomes. METHODS: All patients underwent periareolar endoscopic MICS using high-definition three-dimensional endoscopic visualization without additional rib-spreading. Patients presented with degenerative and/or functional mitral regurgitation. Patients undergoing concomitant tricuspid valve surgery, cryo-ablation, patent foramen ovale closure, left atrial appendage occlusion and/or left atrial myxoma extirpation were included. This descriptive article analysed the aesthetic and functional outcome of the periareolar scar using 5 most common and clinimetrically sound scar assessment scales. For statistical analysis of the scar assessment grading scales, box and whisker plots were calculated depicting median, interquartile range and high and low range data points. RESULTS: Median scar assessment scale scores for n = 100 male patients (response rate 100/109; 91.7%) were 2 [1, 4], 7.5 [6, 9], 11 [8, 14], 3 [2, 3] and 10 [9, 11] for the Vancouver scar scale, Manchester scar scale, patient scar assessment scale, Stony brook scar evaluation scale and Dermatology Quality of Life Index scale, respectively. Ninety-seven patients received mitral valve repair, 7 mitral valve replacement, whereas 5 had left atrial myxoma extirpation. Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty, cryo-ablation, left atrial appendage occlusion and patent foramen ovale closure surgery were performed in 12, 29, 5 and 8 patients, respectively. Median procedure, cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 169.5 [154.3, 189.3], 111.5 [97, 127], and 68.5 [58.8, 81] min, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Periareolar endoscopic MICS is safe and cosmetically appealing. It is feasible and allows for complex mitral valve repair, mitral valve replacement and concomitant surgery. Data from 5 scar assessment scales suggest that this technique delivers patient-satisfying results regarding functional and cosmetic outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   A successful minimally invasive mitral valve repair following delayed device embolization in a patient with Pascal device implantation [J].
Akansel, Serdar ;
Suendermann, Simon H. ;
Kofler, Markus ;
Van Praet, Karel M. ;
Kukucka, Marian ;
Falk, Volkmar ;
Kempfert, Joerg .
TURK GOGUS KALP DAMAR CERRAHISI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 28 (02) :404-406
[2]  
Baryza Mary Jo, 1995, Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, V16, P535, DOI 10.1097/00004630-199509000-00013
[3]   A new quantitative scale for clinical scar assessment [J].
Beausang, E ;
Floyd, H ;
Dunn, KW ;
Orton, CI ;
Ferguson, MWJ .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1998, 102 (06) :1954-1961
[4]   Standards defining a 'Heart Valve Centre': ESC Working Group on Valvular Heart Disease and European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery Viewpoint [J].
Chambers, John B. ;
Prendergast, Bernard ;
Iung, Bernard ;
Rosenhek, Raphael ;
Luis Zamorano, Jose ;
Pierard, Luc A. ;
Modine, Thomas ;
Falk, Volkmar ;
Kappetein, Arie Pieter ;
Pibarot, Phillipe ;
Sundt, Thoralf ;
Baumgartner, Helmut ;
Bax, Jeroen. J. ;
Lancellotti, Patrizio .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 38 (28) :2177-+
[5]   The patient and observer scar assessment scale: A reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation [J].
Draaijers, LJ ;
Tempelman, FRH ;
Botman, YAM ;
Tuinebreijer, WE ;
Middelkoop, E ;
Kreis, RW ;
van Zuijlen, PPM .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (07) :1960-1965
[6]   Comparison of minimally invasive cardiac surgery incisions: Periareolar approach in female patients [J].
Durdu, Mustafa Serkan ;
Baran, Cagdas ;
Gumus, Fatih ;
Deniz, Gokay ;
Cakici, Mehmet ;
Ozcinar, Evren ;
Bermede, Ahmet Onat ;
Ucanok, Kemalattin ;
Akar, Ahmet Ruchan .
ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 20 (05) :283-288
[7]   DERMATOLOGY LIFE QUALITY INDEX (DLQI) - A SIMPLE PRACTICAL MEASURE FOR ROUTINE CLINICAL USE [J].
FINLAY, AY ;
KHAN, GK .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 1994, 19 (03) :210-216
[8]   Periareolar incision for the management of benign breast tumors [J].
Kong, Xiangnan ;
Chen, Xi ;
Jiang, Liyu ;
Ma, Tingting ;
Han, Baosan ;
Yang, Qifeng .
ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 12 (05) :3259-3263
[9]   Pilot study of totally thoracoscopic periareolar approach for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Towards even less invasive? [J].
Maruszewski, Marcin ;
Smoczynski, Radoslaw ;
Kowalewski, Mariusz ;
Bartczak, Maciej ;
Witkowska, Anna ;
Staromlynski, Jakub ;
Drobinski, Dominik ;
Kujawski, Mariusz ;
Suwalski, Piotr .
VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2019, 14 (02) :326-332
[10]   Rating the resolving hypertrophic scar: Comparison of the Vancouver scar scale and scar volume [J].
Nedelec, B ;
Shankowsky, HA ;
Tredget, EE .
JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & REHABILITATION, 2000, 21 (03) :205-212