A user-centered approach to developing a new tool measuring the behavioural and social drivers of vaccination

被引:6
作者
Wiley, K. E. [1 ]
Levy, D. [2 ]
Shapiro, G. K. [3 ]
Dube, E. [4 ]
SteelFisher, G. K. [5 ]
Sevdalis, N. [6 ]
Ganter-Restrepo, F. [7 ]
Menning, L. [7 ]
Leask, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, Room 127,Edward Ford Bldg A27, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Susan Wakil Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Support Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Laval, Fac Social Sci, Dept Anthropol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Boston, MA USA
[6] Kings Coll London, Hlth Serv & Populat Res Dept, Ctr Implementat Sci, London, England
[7] WHO Headquarters Dept Immunizat Vaccines & Biol, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
Childhood vaccination; Survey; Qualitative interview; Social research; User-centered design; DESIGN THINKING; HESITANCY; VACCINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.09.007
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Children around the world remain under-vaccinated for many reasons. To develop effective vaccine delivery programmes and monitor intervention impact, vaccine programme implementers need to understand reasons for under-vaccination within their local context. The World Health Organization (WHO) Working Group on the Behavioural and Social Drivers of Vaccination (BeSD) is developing stan-dardised tools for assessing childhood vaccine acceptance and uptake that can be used across regions and countries. The tools will include: (1) a validated survey; (2) qualitative interview guides; and (3) cor-responding user guidance. We report a user-centred needs assessment of key end-users of the BeSD tools. Methods: Twenty qualitative interviews (Apr-Aug 2019) with purposively sampled vaccine programme managers, partners and stakeholders from UNICEF and WHO country and regional offices. The interviews assessed current systems, practices and challenges in data utilisation and reflections on how the BeSD tools might be optimised. Framework analysis was used to code the interviews. Results: Regarding current practices, participants described a variety of settings, data systems, and fre-quencies of vaccination attitude measurement. They reported that the majority of data used is quantita-tive, and there is appetite for increased use of qualitative data. Capacity for conducting studies on social/ behavioural drivers of vaccination was high in some jurisdictions and needed in others. Issues include barriers to collecting such data and variability in sources. Reflecting on the tools, participants described the need to explore the attitudes and practices of healthcare workers in addition to parents and care-givers. Participants were supportive of the proposed mixed-methods structure of the tools and training in their usage, and highlighted the need for balance between tool standardisation and flexibility to adapt locally. Conclusions: A user-centred approach in developing the BeSD tools has given valuable direction to their design, bringing the use of behavioural and social data to the heart of programme planning. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:6283 / 6290
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Atkinson Rowland., 2001, SOC RES UPDATE, V33, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1442-2018.2010.00541.X
[2]   Underlying factors impacting vaccine hesitancy in high income countries: a review of qualitative studies [J].
Dube, Eve ;
Gagnon, Dominique ;
MacDonald, Noni ;
Bocquier, Aurelie ;
Peretti-Watel, Patrick ;
Verger, Pierre .
EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2018, 17 (11) :989-1004
[3]   The WHO Tailoring Immunization Programmes (TIP) approach: Review of implementation to date [J].
Dube, Eve ;
Leask, Julie ;
Wolff, Brent ;
Hickler, Benjamin ;
Balaban, Victor ;
Hosein, Everold ;
Habersaat, Katrine .
VACCINE, 2018, 36 (11) :1509-1515
[4]   Nurses and nurse assistants' experiences with using a design thinking approach to innovation in a nursing home [J].
Eines, Trude Floystad ;
Vatne, Solfrid .
JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2018, 26 (04) :425-431
[5]  
Experts SAGo, 2014, REP SAGE WORK GROUP
[6]   Using design thinking to engage autistic students in participatory design of an online toolkit to help with transition into higher education [J].
Fabri, Marc ;
Andrews, Penny C. S. ;
Pukki, Heta K. .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, 10 (02) :102-114
[7]   Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research [J].
Gale, Nicola K. ;
Heath, Gemma ;
Cameron, Elaine ;
Rashid, Sabina ;
Redwood, Sabi .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13
[8]   The benefit of the doubt or doubts over benefits? A systematic literature review of perceived risks of vaccines in European populations [J].
Karafillakis, Emilie ;
Larson, Heidi J. .
VACCINE, 2017, 35 (37) :4840-4850
[9]   Iterative user centered design for development of a patient-centered fall prevention toolkit [J].
Katsulis, Zachary ;
Ergai, Awatef ;
Leung, Wai Yin ;
Schenkel, Laura ;
Rai, Amisha ;
Adelman, Jason ;
Benneyan, James ;
Bates, David W. ;
Dykes, Patricia C. .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2016, 56 :117-126
[10]   Measuring vaccine hesitancy: The development of a survey tool [J].
Larson, Heidi J. ;
Jarrett, Caitlin ;
Schulz, William S. ;
Chaudhuri, Mohuya ;
Zhou, Yuqing ;
Dube, Eve ;
Schuster, Melanie ;
MacDonald, Noni E. ;
Wilson, Rose .
VACCINE, 2015, 33 (34) :4165-4175