Using Mixed-Model Item Response Theory to Analyze Organizational Survey Responses: An Illustration Using the Job Descriptive Index

被引:21
作者
Carter, Nathan T. [1 ]
Dalal, Dev K. [3 ]
Lake, Christopher J.
Lin, Bing C. [2 ]
Zickar, Michael J.
机构
[1] Bowling Green State Univ, Dept Psychol, Bowling Green, OH 43402 USA
[2] Portland State Univ, Dept Psychol, Coll Arts & Sci, Appl Psychol Program,Ind Org Psychol Area, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[3] Bowling Green State Univ, Ind Org Psychol Program, Bowling Green, OH 43402 USA
关键词
item response theory; latent class analysis; invariance testing; INTERPERSONAL-TRUST; PERSONALITY; SATISFACTION; AFFECTIVITY; PARAMETERS; LEADERSHIP; CATEGORY; ABILITY; WORKERS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/1094428110363309
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In this article, the authors illustrate the use of mixed-model item response theory (MM-IRT) and explain its usefulness for analyzing organizational surveys. The authors begin by giving an overview of MM-IRT, focusing on both technical aspects and previous organizational applications. Guidance is provided on how researchers can use MM-IRT to check scoring assumptions, identify the influence of systematic responding that is unrelated to item content (i.e., response sets), and evaluate individual and group difference variables as predictors of class membership. After summarizing the current body of research using MM-IRT to address problems relevant to organizational researchers, the authors present an illustration of the use of MM-IRT with the Job Descriptive Index (JDI), focusing on the use of the "?'' response option. Three classes emerged, one most likely to respond in the positive direction, one most likely to respond in the negative direction, and another most likely to use the "?'' response. Trust in management, job tenure, age, race, and sex were considered as correlates of class membership. Results are discussed in terms of the applicability of MM-IRT and future research endeavors.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 146
页数:31
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks [J].
Abrams, LC ;
Cross, R ;
Lesser, E ;
Levin, DZ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2003, 17 (04) :64-77
[2]  
Akaike H., 1998, Selected papers of Hirotugu Akaike, P199, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15
[3]  
Andrich D., 2005, APPL RASCH MEASUREME
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Mathematical Methods of Statistics
[5]  
[Anonymous], RESPONSE FORMAT ATTI
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ITEM RESPONSE THEORY
[7]  
[Anonymous], LATENTGOLD V4 5
[8]  
[Anonymous], APPL PERSONALITY PSY
[9]  
[Anonymous], STAT PROCESS CONTROL
[10]  
[Anonymous], WINMIRA 2001 WINDOWS