Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review

被引:142
作者
Glaser, Johanna [1 ]
Nouri, Sarah [2 ]
Fernandez, Alicia [3 ,4 ]
Sudore, Rebecca L. [5 ,6 ]
Schillinger, Dean [3 ,4 ]
Klein-Fedyshin, Michele [7 ]
Schenker, Yael [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Gen Internal Med, Zuckerberg San Francisco Gen Hosp, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] UCSF, Zuckerberg San Francisco Gen Hosp, Ctr Vulnerable Populat, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Div Geriatr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[6] San Francisco Vet Affairs Hlth Care Syst, San Francisco, CA USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Hlth Sci Lib Syst, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[8] Univ Pittsburgh, Div Gen Internal Med, Sect Palliat Care & Med Eth, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
comprehension; informed consent; interpersonal communication; intervention; understanding; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PORTABLE VIDEO MEDIA; CATARACT-SURGERY; RISK-RECALL; MULTIMEDIA; INFORMATION; EDUCATION; SATISFACTION; WRITTEN; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X19896348
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Patient comprehension is fundamental to valid informed consent. Current practices often result in inadequate patient comprehension. Purpose. An updated review to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of interventions to improve patient comprehension in clinical informed consent. Data Sources. Systematic searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE (2008-2018). Study Selection. We included randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials evaluating interventions to improve patient comprehension in clinical informed consent. Data Extraction. Reviewers independently abstracted data using a standardized form, comparing all results and resolving disagreements by consensus. Data Synthesis. Fifty-two studies of 60 interventions met inclusion criteria. Compared with standard informed consent, a statistically significant improvement in patient comprehension was seen with 43% (6/14) of written interventions, 56% (15/27) of audiovisual interventions, 67% (2/3) of multicomponent interventions, 85% (11/13) of interactive digital interventions, and 100% (3/3) of verbal discussion with test/feedback or teach-back interventions. Eighty-five percent of studies (44/52) evaluated patients' understanding of risks, 69% (41/52) general knowledge about the procedure, 35% (18/52) understanding of benefits, and 31% (16/52) understanding of alternatives. Participants' education level was reported heterogeneously, and only 8% (4/52) of studies examined effects according to health literacy. Most studies (79%, 41/52) did not specify participants' race/ethnicity. Limitations. Variation in interventions and outcome measures precluded conduct of a meta-analysis or calculation of mean effect size. Control group processes were variable and inconsistently characterized. Nearly half of studies (44%, 23/52) had a high risk of bias for the patient comprehension outcome. Conclusions. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent are heterogeneous. Interactive interventions, particularly with test/feedback or teach-back components, appear superior. Future research should emphasize all key elements of informed consent and explore effects among vulnerable populations.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 143
页数:25
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2019, AHRQ INF CONS AUTH T
[2]   Informed consent: do information pamphlets improve post-operative risk-recall in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy: prospective randomized control study [J].
Alsaffar, Hussain ;
Wilson, Lindsay ;
Kamdar, Dev P. ;
Sultanov, Faizullo ;
Enepekides, Danny ;
Higgins, Kevin M. .
JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2016, 45
[3]   Measuring critical deficits in shared decision making before elective surgery [J].
Ankuda, Claire K. ;
Block, Susan D. ;
Cooper, Zara ;
Correll, Darin J. ;
Hepner, David L. ;
Lasic, Morana ;
Gawande, Atul A. ;
Bader, Angela M. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2014, 94 (03) :328-333
[4]   World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [J].
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (20) :2191-2194
[5]  
[Anonymous], INFORM CONSENT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, R1. UK Department of Health. Reference guide to consent for examination or treatment
[7]  
[Anonymous], IMPL NAT VOL CONS ST
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2016, International ethical guidelines for international ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans, DOI DOI 10.56759/RGXL7405
[9]   The role of informed consent in risks recall in otorhinolaryngology surgeries: verbal (nonintervention) vs written (intervention) summaries of risks [J].
Aremu, Shuaib Kayode ;
Alabi, Biodun S. ;
Segun-Busari, Segun .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2011, 32 (06) :485-489
[10]   Portable video media for presenting informed consent and wound care instructions for skin biopsies: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Armstrong, A. W. ;
Alikhan, A. ;
Cheng, L. S. ;
Schupp, C. ;
Kurlinkus, C. ;
Eisen, D. B. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2010, 163 (05) :1014-1019