Feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men at senior age ≥75 years: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of a high-volume center

被引:15
|
作者
Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi [1 ]
Wagner, Christian [1 ]
Schuette, Andreas [1 ]
Liakos, Nikolaos [1 ]
Karagiotis, Theodoros [1 ]
Mendrek, Mikolaj [1 ]
Rachubinski, Pawel [1 ]
Oelke, Matthias [1 ]
Tian, Zhe [2 ]
Witt, Jorn H. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Urol Pediat Urol & Urooncol, Prostate Ctr Northwest, Gronau, Germany
[2] Univ Montreal, Canc Prognost & Hlth Outcomes Unit, Hlth Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Frailty; comorbidity; age factors; urinary incontinence; erectile dysfunction; propensity score matching; CANCER; OLDER; SCORE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1080/13685538.2021.2018417
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of this study was to assess whether age >= 75 years impairs surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Materials and methods Patients with prostate cancer (PCa) were stratified in >= 75(n = 669) vs. <70 years(n = 8,268). Multivariable cox regression analyses (MVA) tested for effect of senior age on erectile function-, urinary continence-recovery, biochemical recurrence (BCR), and metastatic progression (MP). Results RARP duration, blood loss, and 30d complication rates were similar between groups. For patients >= 75 vs. <70 years, rates of erectile function after 36 and urinary continence after 12 months were 27 vs. 56% (p < 0.001) and 85 vs. 86% (p = 0.99), respectively. Mean quality of life (QoL) score after 12 months improved in both groups (p = 0.9). At 48 months, BCR- and MP-free rates were 77 vs. 85% (p < 0.001) and 97 vs. 98% (p = 0.3), respectively. MVA confirmed the negative effect of senior age on erectile function but no significant effect on urinary continence, BCR or MP, before and after propensity score matching. Conclusion Apart from erectile function, senior age has no significant effect on urinary continence recovery, BCR- or MP-free rates after RARP. Post-RARP QoL improved even in senior patients. Modern therapy of senior PCa patients should be based on individual counseling than just age.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 16
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk factors of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-volume center: results in 732 cases
    Porcaro, Antonio Benito
    Sebben, Marco
    Corsi, Paolo
    Tafuri, Alessandro
    Processali, Tania
    Pirozzi, Marco
    Amigoni, Nelia
    Rizzetto, Riccardo
    Cacciamani, Giovanni
    Mariotto, Arianna
    Diminutto, Alberto
    Brunelli, Matteo
    De Marco, Vincenzo
    Siracusano, Salvatore
    Artibani, Walter
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2020, 14 (01) : 167 - 175
  • [42] Age stratified comparative analysis of perioperative, functional and oncologic outcomes in patients after robot assisted radical prostatectomy - A propensity score matched study
    Kumar, A.
    Samavedi, S.
    Bates, A. S.
    Cuevas, Camilo A. Giedelman
    Coelho, R. F.
    Rocco, B.
    Palmer, K.
    Patel, V. R.
    EJSO, 2015, 41 (07): : 837 - 843
  • [43] Safe Introduction of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy after a Training Program in a High-Volume Robotic Centre
    Lumen, Nicolaas
    Van Praet, Charles
    De Troyer, Bart
    Fonteyne, Valerie
    Oosterlinck, Willem
    Decaestecker, Karel
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2013, 91 (02) : 145 - 152
  • [44] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy - Review of the Literature Concerning Oncological and Functional Outcome of Patients
    Gilfrich, Christian
    Brookman-May, Sabine
    May, Matthias
    Lebentrau, Steffen
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2014, 45 (06) : 471 - 485
  • [45] EARLY COMPARISON BETWEEN ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AND HEMI-GLAND CRYOABLATION IN ONCOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES
    Silecchia, Giovanni
    Troiano, Francesco
    Selvaggio, Oscar
    Cormio, Luigi
    Carrieri, Giuseppe
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 40 (08) : 4579 - 4580
  • [46] Comparison of oncological outcomes between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis stratified by surgical experience
    Park, Jinsung
    Yoo, Dae-Seon
    Song, Cheryn
    Park, Sahyun
    Park, Sejun
    Kim, Seong Cheol
    Cho, Yongmee
    Ahn, Hanjong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (01) : 193 - 199
  • [47] Outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with previous transurethral resection of prostate
    Gupta, Narmada P.
    Singh, Prabhjot
    Nayyar, Rishi
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (09) : 1501 - 1505
  • [48] Hospital Volume, Utilization, Costs and Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Yu, Hua-yin
    Hevelone, Nathanael D.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Kowalczyk, Keith J.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Hu, Jim C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (05) : 1632 - 1637
  • [49] Salvage Versus Primary Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity-matched Comparative Effectiveness Study from a High-volume Tertiary Centre
    Nathan, Arjun
    Fricker, Monty
    De Groote, Ruben
    Arora, Amandeep
    Phuah, Yuzhi
    Flora, Kiran
    Patel, Sonam
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Sridhar, Ashwin
    Shaw, Greg
    Kelly, John
    Briggs, Tim
    Rajan, Prabhakar
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Nathan, Senthil
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 27 : 43 - 52
  • [50] Does prostate volume have an impact on the functional and oncological results of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
    Galfano, Antonio
    Panarello, Daniele
    Secco, Silvia
    Di Trapani, Dario
    Barbieri, Michele
    Napoli, Giancarlo
    Strada, Elena
    Petralia, Giovanni
    Bocciardi, Aldo M.
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2018, 70 (04) : 408 - 413