Feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men at senior age ≥75 years: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of a high-volume center

被引:15
|
作者
Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi [1 ]
Wagner, Christian [1 ]
Schuette, Andreas [1 ]
Liakos, Nikolaos [1 ]
Karagiotis, Theodoros [1 ]
Mendrek, Mikolaj [1 ]
Rachubinski, Pawel [1 ]
Oelke, Matthias [1 ]
Tian, Zhe [2 ]
Witt, Jorn H. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Urol Pediat Urol & Urooncol, Prostate Ctr Northwest, Gronau, Germany
[2] Univ Montreal, Canc Prognost & Hlth Outcomes Unit, Hlth Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Frailty; comorbidity; age factors; urinary incontinence; erectile dysfunction; propensity score matching; CANCER; OLDER; SCORE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1080/13685538.2021.2018417
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of this study was to assess whether age >= 75 years impairs surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Materials and methods Patients with prostate cancer (PCa) were stratified in >= 75(n = 669) vs. <70 years(n = 8,268). Multivariable cox regression analyses (MVA) tested for effect of senior age on erectile function-, urinary continence-recovery, biochemical recurrence (BCR), and metastatic progression (MP). Results RARP duration, blood loss, and 30d complication rates were similar between groups. For patients >= 75 vs. <70 years, rates of erectile function after 36 and urinary continence after 12 months were 27 vs. 56% (p < 0.001) and 85 vs. 86% (p = 0.99), respectively. Mean quality of life (QoL) score after 12 months improved in both groups (p = 0.9). At 48 months, BCR- and MP-free rates were 77 vs. 85% (p < 0.001) and 97 vs. 98% (p = 0.3), respectively. MVA confirmed the negative effect of senior age on erectile function but no significant effect on urinary continence, BCR or MP, before and after propensity score matching. Conclusion Apart from erectile function, senior age has no significant effect on urinary continence recovery, BCR- or MP-free rates after RARP. Post-RARP QoL improved even in senior patients. Modern therapy of senior PCa patients should be based on individual counseling than just age.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 16
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN MEN AGED ≥70 YEARS
    Singh, Rajinder
    Hicks, James A.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 (06) : 886 - 887
  • [32] Clinical factors affecting perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Murakami, Tomohiko
    Otsubo, Satoshi
    Namitome, Ryo
    Shiota, Masaki
    Inokuchi, Junichi
    Takeuchi, Ario
    Kashiwagi, Eiji
    Tatsugami, Katsunori
    Eto, Masatoshi
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 9 (05) : 575 - 581
  • [33] Functional and oncological outcomes of salvage external beam radiotherapy following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a Canadian cohort
    Ajib, Khaled
    Zanaty, Marc
    Alnazari, Mansour
    Rajih, Emad
    Hueber, Pierre-Alain
    Mansour, Mila
    Valdivieso, Roger
    Negrean, Cristina
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Taussky, Daniel
    Delouya, Guila
    El-Hakim, Assaad
    Zorn, Kevin C.
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (02): : 45 - 49
  • [34] Early oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-grade prostate cancer
    Wambi, Chris O.
    Siddiqui, Sameer A.
    Krane, L. Spencer
    Agarwal, Piyush K.
    Stricker, Hans J.
    Peabody, James O.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (11) : 1739 - 1745
  • [35] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: 5-Year Oncological and Biochemical Outcomes
    Liss, Michael A.
    Lusch, Achim
    Morales, Blanca
    Beheshti, Nima
    Skarecky, Douglas
    Narula, Navneet
    Osann, Kathryn
    Ahlering, Thomas E.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 188 (06) : 2205 - 2210
  • [36] Patient-reported Functional Outcomes Following Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed by High-volume Surgeons at High-volume Hospitals
    Gershman, Boris
    Psutka, Sarah P.
    McGovern, Francis J.
    Dahl, Douglas M.
    Tabatabaei, Shahin
    Gettman, Matthew T.
    Frank, Igor
    Carlson, Rachel E.
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Barry, Michael J.
    Blute, Michael L.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2016, 2 (02): : 172 - 179
  • [37] Can Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Improve Functional Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy? Experience at a Laparoscopic Center
    Lu, Cheng-Hsin
    Wu, Chun-Hsien
    Chen, Yu-Chi
    Chen, Chung-Hsien
    Wu, Richard Chen-Yu
    Lee, Yeh-Hsi
    Huang, Ching-Yu
    Yu, Tsan-Jung
    Lin, Victor C.
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 30 (03) : 124 - 130
  • [38] Functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance
    Zanaty, Marc
    Ajib, Khaled
    Zorn, Kevin
    El-Hakim, Assaad
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (09) : 1391 - 1397
  • [39] Associations between Hospital Volume and Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Xia, Leilei
    Sperling, Colin D.
    Taylor, Benjamin L.
    Talwar, Ruchika
    Chelluri, Raju R.
    Raman, Jay D.
    Lee, Daniel J.
    Lee, David I.
    Guzzo, Thomas J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (05) : 926 - 931
  • [40] Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center
    Porcaro, Antonio Benito
    Tafuri, Alessandro
    Sebben, Marco
    Amigoni, Nelia
    Shakir, Aliasger
    Corsi, Paolo
    Processali, Tania
    Pirozzi, Marco
    Rizzetto, Riccardo
    Bernasconi, Riccardo
    Cerrato, Clara
    Tiso, Leone
    Migliorini, Filippo
    Novella, Giovanni
    Brunelli, Matteo
    De Marco, Vincenzo
    Siracusano, Salvatore
    Artibani, Walter
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2020, 14 (04) : 663 - 675