Who teaches medical billing? A national cross-sectional survey of Australian medical education stakeholders

被引:9
作者
Faux, Margaret [1 ]
Wardle, Jonathan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thompson-Butel, Angelica G. [4 ]
Adams, Jon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol, Fac Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Australian Catholic Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
health economics; health Policy; law (see medical law); public health;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020712
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance Billing errors and healthcare fraud have been described by the WHO as the last great unreduced health-care cost'. Estimates suggest that 7% of global health expenditure (US$487billion) is wasted from this phenomenon. Irrespective of different payment models, challenges exist at the interface of medical billing and medical practice across the globe. Medical billing education has been cited as an effective preventative strategy, with targeted education saving $A250million in Australia in 1year from an estimated $A1-3billion of waste. Objective This study attempts to systematically map all avenues of medical practitioner education on medical billing in Australia and explores the perceptions of medical education stakeholders on this topic. Design National cross-sectional survey between April 2014 and June 2015. No patient or public involvement. Data analysis-descriptive statistics via frequency distributions. Participants All stakeholders who educate medical practitioners regarding clinical practice (n=66). 86% responded. Results There is little medical billing education occurring in Australia. The majority of stakeholders (70%, n=40) did not offer/have never offered a medical billing course. 89% thought medical billing should be taught, including 30% (n=17) who were already teaching it. There was no consensus on when medical billing education should occur. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first attempt of any country to map the ways doctors learn the complex legal and administrative infrastructure in which they work. Consistent with US findings, Australian doctors may not have expected legal and administrative literacy. Rather than reliance on ad hoc training, development of an Australian medical billing curriculum should be encouraged to improve compliance, expedite judicial processes and reduce waste. In the absence of adequate education, disciplinary bodies in all countries must consider pleas of ignorance by doctors under investigation, where appropriate, for incorrect medical billing.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Vaccine confidence among people who use drugs: A cross-sectional survey [J].
Frew, Paula M. ;
Schamel, Jay T. ;
Randall, Laura A. ;
King, Adrian R. ;
Spaulding, Anne C. ;
Wu, Elizabeth ;
Holloway, Ian W. .
HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2022, 18 (06)
[22]   Medical residency in Portugal: a cross-sectional study on the working conditions ( vol 3, 1190357, 2023) [J].
Chen-Xu, Jose ;
Castilho, Bruno Miranda ;
Fernandes, Bruno Moura ;
Goncalves, Diana Silva ;
Ferreira, Andre ;
Goncalves, Ana Catarina ;
Ferreira Vieira, Maycoll ;
Silva, Andreia M. ;
Borges, Fabio ;
Mamede, Monica Paes .
FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES, 2025, 4
[23]   Medical cannabis use in the Australian community following introduction of legal access: the 2018-2019 Online Cross-Sectional Cannabis as Medicine Survey (CAMS-18) [J].
Lintzeris, Nicholas ;
Mills, Llewellyn ;
Suraev, Anastasia ;
Bravo, Maria ;
Arkell, Thomas ;
Arnold, Jonathon C. ;
Benson, Melissa J. ;
McGregor, Iain S. .
HARM REDUCTION JOURNAL, 2020, 17 (01)
[24]   Low back pain in the Bangladeshi adult population: a cross-sectional national survey [J].
Majumder, Muhammad Shoaib Momen ;
Hakim, Ferdous ;
Bandhan, Iftekhar Hussain ;
Razzaque, Mohammad Abdur ;
Zahid-Al-Quadir, Ahmad ;
Ahmed, Shamim ;
Choudhury, Minhaj Rahim ;
Haq, Syed Atiqul ;
Zaman, M. M. .
BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (09)
[25]   Motivators and Barriers to Career Choices in Community Medicine Among Medical Students in South Punjab, Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Survey [J].
Khan, Raamish A. ;
Tariq, Muneera ;
Sultan, Ifra ;
Khan, Allahdad ;
Riaz, Abdul Ahad ;
Shahzad, Humna ;
Uzair, Muhammad ;
Younus, Ayesha ;
Bin Shahid, Muhammad Zain ;
Poombal, F. N. U. .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (08)
[26]   Canadians' opinions towards COVID-19 data-sharing: a national cross-sectional survey [J].
Savic Kallesoe, Sarah A. ;
Rabbani, Tian ;
Gill, Erin E. ;
Brinkman, Fiona ;
Griffiths, Emma J. ;
Zawati, Ma'n ;
Liu, Hanshi ;
Palmour, Nicole ;
Joly, Yann ;
Hsiao, William W. L. .
BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (02)
[27]   What is the extent of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Bangladesh? A cross-sectional rapid national survey [J].
Ali, Mohammad ;
Hossain, Ahmed .
BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (08)
[28]   Patient preferences and attitudes towards first choice medical services in Shenzhen, China: a cross-sectional study [J].
Zhao, Xinyu ;
Xiao, Junhui ;
Chen, Huida ;
Lin, Kena ;
Li, Xiaoman ;
Zeng, Zhiwen ;
Huang, Shuyun ;
Xie, Zhikui ;
Du, Jinlin .
BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05)
[29]   Determinants of physicians' online medical services uptake: a cross-sectional study applying social ecosystem theory [J].
Peng, Xueqing ;
Li, Zhiguang ;
Zhang, Chi ;
Liu, Rui ;
Jiang, Yongzhi ;
Chen, Jiayu ;
Qi, Zixin ;
Ge, Jinjin ;
Zhao, Shiqi ;
Zhou, Meng ;
You, Hua .
BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (09)
[30]   Views and experiences of the NHS Health Check provided by general medical practices: cross-sectional survey in high-risk patients [J].
Krska, Janet ;
du Plessis, Ruth ;
Chellaswamy, Hannah .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 37 (02) :210-217