Who teaches medical billing? A national cross-sectional survey of Australian medical education stakeholders

被引:8
作者
Faux, Margaret [1 ]
Wardle, Jonathan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thompson-Butel, Angelica G. [4 ]
Adams, Jon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol, Fac Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Australian Catholic Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2018年 / 8卷 / 07期
关键词
health economics; health Policy; law (see medical law); public health;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020712
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance Billing errors and healthcare fraud have been described by the WHO as the last great unreduced health-care cost'. Estimates suggest that 7% of global health expenditure (US$487billion) is wasted from this phenomenon. Irrespective of different payment models, challenges exist at the interface of medical billing and medical practice across the globe. Medical billing education has been cited as an effective preventative strategy, with targeted education saving $A250million in Australia in 1year from an estimated $A1-3billion of waste. Objective This study attempts to systematically map all avenues of medical practitioner education on medical billing in Australia and explores the perceptions of medical education stakeholders on this topic. Design National cross-sectional survey between April 2014 and June 2015. No patient or public involvement. Data analysis-descriptive statistics via frequency distributions. Participants All stakeholders who educate medical practitioners regarding clinical practice (n=66). 86% responded. Results There is little medical billing education occurring in Australia. The majority of stakeholders (70%, n=40) did not offer/have never offered a medical billing course. 89% thought medical billing should be taught, including 30% (n=17) who were already teaching it. There was no consensus on when medical billing education should occur. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first attempt of any country to map the ways doctors learn the complex legal and administrative infrastructure in which they work. Consistent with US findings, Australian doctors may not have expected legal and administrative literacy. Rather than reliance on ad hoc training, development of an Australian medical billing curriculum should be encouraged to improve compliance, expedite judicial processes and reduce waste. In the absence of adequate education, disciplinary bodies in all countries must consider pleas of ignorance by doctors under investigation, where appropriate, for incorrect medical billing.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Medical residency in Portugal: a cross-sectional study on the working conditions ( vol 3, 1190357, 2023)
    Chen-Xu, Jose
    Castilho, Bruno Miranda
    Fernandes, Bruno Moura
    Goncalves, Diana Silva
    Ferreira, Andre
    Goncalves, Ana Catarina
    Ferreira Vieira, Maycoll
    Silva, Andreia M.
    Borges, Fabio
    Mamede, Monica Paes
    FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES, 2025, 4
  • [22] Medical cannabis use in the Australian community following introduction of legal access: the 2018-2019 Online Cross-Sectional Cannabis as Medicine Survey (CAMS-18)
    Lintzeris, Nicholas
    Mills, Llewellyn
    Suraev, Anastasia
    Bravo, Maria
    Arkell, Thomas
    Arnold, Jonathon C.
    Benson, Melissa J.
    McGregor, Iain S.
    HARM REDUCTION JOURNAL, 2020, 17 (01)
  • [23] Low back pain in the Bangladeshi adult population: a cross-sectional national survey
    Majumder, Muhammad Shoaib Momen
    Hakim, Ferdous
    Bandhan, Iftekhar Hussain
    Razzaque, Mohammad Abdur
    Zahid-Al-Quadir, Ahmad
    Ahmed, Shamim
    Choudhury, Minhaj Rahim
    Haq, Syed Atiqul
    Zaman, M. M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [24] Motivators and Barriers to Career Choices in Community Medicine Among Medical Students in South Punjab, Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Survey
    Khan, Raamish A.
    Tariq, Muneera
    Sultan, Ifra
    Khan, Allahdad
    Riaz, Abdul Ahad
    Shahzad, Humna
    Uzair, Muhammad
    Younus, Ayesha
    Bin Shahid, Muhammad Zain
    Poombal, F. N. U.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [25] What is the extent of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Bangladesh? A cross-sectional rapid national survey
    Ali, Mohammad
    Hossain, Ahmed
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [26] Canadians' opinions towards COVID-19 data-sharing: a national cross-sectional survey
    Savic Kallesoe, Sarah A.
    Rabbani, Tian
    Gill, Erin E.
    Brinkman, Fiona
    Griffiths, Emma J.
    Zawati, Ma'n
    Liu, Hanshi
    Palmour, Nicole
    Joly, Yann
    Hsiao, William W. L.
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [27] Patient preferences and attitudes towards first choice medical services in Shenzhen, China: a cross-sectional study
    Zhao, Xinyu
    Xiao, Junhui
    Chen, Huida
    Lin, Kena
    Li, Xiaoman
    Zeng, Zhiwen
    Huang, Shuyun
    Xie, Zhikui
    Du, Jinlin
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [28] Determinants of physicians' online medical services uptake: a cross-sectional study applying social ecosystem theory
    Peng, Xueqing
    Li, Zhiguang
    Zhang, Chi
    Liu, Rui
    Jiang, Yongzhi
    Chen, Jiayu
    Qi, Zixin
    Ge, Jinjin
    Zhao, Shiqi
    Zhou, Meng
    You, Hua
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [29] Support for mobilising medical students to join the COVID-19 pandemic emergency healthcare workforce: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey
    Astorp, Mike Saederup
    Sorensen, Gustav Valentin Blichfeldt
    Rasmussen, Sten
    Emmersen, Jeppe
    Erbs, Alexander Wolfhagen
    Andersen, Stig
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (09):
  • [30] Views and experiences of the NHS Health Check provided by general medical practices: cross-sectional survey in high-risk patients
    Krska, Janet
    du Plessis, Ruth
    Chellaswamy, Hannah
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 37 (02) : 210 - 217