Who teaches medical billing? A national cross-sectional survey of Australian medical education stakeholders

被引:8
|
作者
Faux, Margaret [1 ]
Wardle, Jonathan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thompson-Butel, Angelica G. [4 ]
Adams, Jon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol, Fac Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Australian Catholic Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2018年 / 8卷 / 07期
关键词
health economics; health Policy; law (see medical law); public health;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020712
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance Billing errors and healthcare fraud have been described by the WHO as the last great unreduced health-care cost'. Estimates suggest that 7% of global health expenditure (US$487billion) is wasted from this phenomenon. Irrespective of different payment models, challenges exist at the interface of medical billing and medical practice across the globe. Medical billing education has been cited as an effective preventative strategy, with targeted education saving $A250million in Australia in 1year from an estimated $A1-3billion of waste. Objective This study attempts to systematically map all avenues of medical practitioner education on medical billing in Australia and explores the perceptions of medical education stakeholders on this topic. Design National cross-sectional survey between April 2014 and June 2015. No patient or public involvement. Data analysis-descriptive statistics via frequency distributions. Participants All stakeholders who educate medical practitioners regarding clinical practice (n=66). 86% responded. Results There is little medical billing education occurring in Australia. The majority of stakeholders (70%, n=40) did not offer/have never offered a medical billing course. 89% thought medical billing should be taught, including 30% (n=17) who were already teaching it. There was no consensus on when medical billing education should occur. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first attempt of any country to map the ways doctors learn the complex legal and administrative infrastructure in which they work. Consistent with US findings, Australian doctors may not have expected legal and administrative literacy. Rather than reliance on ad hoc training, development of an Australian medical billing curriculum should be encouraged to improve compliance, expedite judicial processes and reduce waste. In the absence of adequate education, disciplinary bodies in all countries must consider pleas of ignorance by doctors under investigation, where appropriate, for incorrect medical billing.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A National Cross-Sectional Survey of Bullying in Syrian Graduate Medical Education
    Swed, Sarya
    Shoib, Sheikh
    Almoshantaf, Mohammad Bader
    Bohsas, Haidara
    Hassan, Ahmad Salah Eldin Mohamed
    Motawea, Karam R.
    Hassan, Noheir Ashraf Ibrahem Fathy
    Ahmad, Eman Mohammed Sharif
    Sheet, Lana
    Khairy, Lina Taha
    Bakkour, Agyad
    Muwaili, Ali Hadi Hussein
    Muwaili, Dhuha Hadi Hussein
    Abdelmajid, Fatima Abubaker Abdalla
    Ahmad, Shoaib
    Hasan, Mohammad Mehedi
    Elkalagi, Nashaat Kamal Hamdy
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [2] Does medical education reform change who is selected? A national cross-sectional survey from China
    You, You
    Wang, Weimin
    Cleland, Jennifer
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (08):
  • [3] Bullying in the American Graduate Medical Education System: A National Cross-Sectional Survey
    Chadaga, Amar R.
    Villines, Dana
    Krikorian, Armand
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (03):
  • [4] Degenerative cervical myelopathy education in UK medical schools: a national cross-sectional survey of medical students
    Brannigan, Jamie F. M.
    Davies, Benjamin M.
    Stewart, Max
    Smith, Sam
    Willison, Alice
    Ahmed, Shahzaib
    Sadler, Iwan
    Sarewitz, Ellen
    Francis, Jibin
    Stacpoole, Sybil R. L.
    Kotter, Mark R. N.
    Mowforth, Oliver D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 36 (06) : 728 - 736
  • [5] Simulation-based medical education in Thailand: a cross-sectional online national survey
    Boonmak, Polpun
    Suraseranivongse, Suwannee
    Pattaravit, Ngamjit
    Boonmak, Suhattaya
    Jirativanont, Tachawan
    Lertbunnaphong, Tripop
    Arora, Rajin
    Watcharotayangul, Jittiya
    Imsuwan, Intanon
    Kwangwaropas, Panithan
    Wittayachamnankul, Borwon
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [6] Simulation-based medical education in Thailand: a cross-sectional online national survey
    Polpun Boonmak
    Suwannee Suraseranivongse
    Ngamjit Pattaravit
    Suhattaya Boonmak
    Tachawan Jirativanont
    Tripop Lertbunnaphong
    Rajin Arora
    Jittiya Watcharotayangul
    Intanon Imsuwan
    Panithan Kwangwaropas
    Borwon Wittayachamnankul
    BMC Medical Education, 22
  • [7] Vaccine Education of Medical Students: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Survey
    Kerneis, Solen
    Jacquet, Caroline
    Bannay, Aurelie
    May, Thierry
    Launay, Odile
    Verger, Pierre
    Pulcini, Celine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 53 (03) : E97 - E104
  • [8] Australian rural medical students' perceived readiness for work as a junior doctor: A cross-sectional national survey
    Graham, Patrick
    Padley, James
    Williams, Susan
    Gonzalez-Chica, David
    Isaac, Vivian
    Walters, Lucie
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2023, 31 (05) : 999 - 1007
  • [9] Cross-sectional survey of education on LGBT content in medical schools in Japan
    Yoshida, Eriko
    Matsushima, Masato
    Okazaki, Fumiko
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [10] Nutrition in medical education in Latin America: Results of a cross-sectional survey
    Cardenas, Diana
    Diaz, Gustavo
    Cadavid, Jessika
    Lipovestky, Fernando
    Canicoba, Marisa
    Sanchez, Paola
    Alvarez, Ludwig
    Duarte, Yan
    Reyes, Jose Guillermo Gutierrez
    de Noyola, Gilda Miranda
    Maza, Claudia
    Porben, Sergio Santana
    Bermudez, Charles Elleri
    Garcia, Yawelida
    Calvo, Isabel
    Arenas, Humberto
    JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2022, 46 (01) : 229 - 237