Impact of power-to-gas on the cost and design of the future low-carbon urban energy system

被引:58
作者
Ikaheimo, Jussi [1 ]
Weiss, Robert [1 ]
Kiviluoma, Juha [1 ]
Pursiheimo, Esa [1 ]
Lindroos, Tomi J. [1 ]
机构
[1] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland Ltd, Smart Energy & Built Environm, Tekn 21, FI-02044 Espoo, Finland
关键词
Power-to-gas; Multi-vector energy networks; Optimal dispatch; Hydrogen; Urban energy systems; Design optimization; CO2; CAPTURE; TECHNOECONOMIC ASSESSMENT; WATER ELECTROLYSIS; EXERGY EFFICIENCY; RENEWABLE POWER; STORAGE; HEAT; ELECTRICITY; PLANTS; HYDROGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117713
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Power-to-gas technology has been proposed as one component for future energy systems facing decarbonization targets. This paper presents a power-to-gas focused open optimization model for studying cost efficient design and operation of future urban energy system. The model is able to distinguish the benefits of different configurations of power-to-gas by modelling several energy vectors, including electricity, heating, and cooling alongside with different plant components. The usefulness of the built multi-vector model is illustrated by a case study where the benefits of power-to-gas are studied in the context of a medium-sized Nordic city. The results show that the city is able to reach carbon neutrality with the help of power-to-gas. Power-to-gas provides cost savings by reducing the need of heat storages and transmission capacity. The savings are greatest when the emission reduction goal is high and transmission capacity expansion is expensive. Direct air capture appears as the superior carbon dioxide source when compared to post combustion capture from flue gases due to costs and annual availability. The case study shows no economic benefit for distributed power-to-gas.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]  
Altfeld K., 2013, Gas Energy, VMarch/2013, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Energ. Wasser-Prax
[3]   Deep decarbonization of urban energy systems through renewable energy and sector-coupling flexibility strategies [J].
Arabzadeh, Vahid ;
Mikkola, Jani ;
Jasiunas, Justinas ;
Lund, Peter D. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 260
[4]  
Aspelund A, 2006, CHEM ENG RES DES, V84, P847, DOI 10.1205/cherd.05147
[5]   Cost effective power-to-X plant using carbon dioxide from a geothermal plant to increase renewable energy penetration [J].
Baccioli, Andrea ;
Bargiacchi, Eleonora ;
Barsali, Stefano ;
Ciambellotti, Alessio ;
Fioriti, Davide ;
Giglioli, Romano ;
Pasini, Gianluca .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 226
[6]   Optimising energy flows and synergies between energy networks [J].
Badami, Marco ;
Fambri, Gabriele .
ENERGY, 2019, 173 :400-412
[7]   Decision-making methodology for managing photovoltaic surplus electricity through Power to Gas: Combined heat and power in urban buildings [J].
Bailera, Manuel ;
Pena, Begona ;
Lisbona, Pilar ;
Romeo, Luis M. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 228 :1032-1045
[8]   Perception of barriers for expansion of electricity grids in the European Union [J].
Battaglini, Antonella ;
Komendantova, Nadejda ;
Brtnik, Patricia ;
Patt, Anthony .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 47 :254-259
[9]   Combined scheduling and capacity planning of electricity-based ammonia production to integrate renewable energies [J].
Beerbuehl, S. Schulte ;
Froehling, M. ;
Schultmann, F. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 241 (03) :851-862
[10]   A general model for energy hub economic dispatch [J].
Beigvand, Soheil Derafshi ;
Abdi, Hamdi ;
La Scala, Massimo .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 190 :1090-1111