Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Pilot Phase-Comparability over Flexibility?

被引:41
作者
Bach, Vanessa [1 ]
Lehmann, Annekatrin [1 ]
Goermer, Marcel [1 ]
Finkbeiner, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Environm Technol, Chair Sustainable Engn, Str 17 Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
关键词
product environmental footprint; PEF; pilot phase; LCA; ISO; 14044; 14040; comparability; comparative assertions; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; WATER-CONSUMPTION; BREAKTHROUGH; BREAKDOWN;
D O I
10.3390/su10082898
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The main goal of the European product environmental footprint (PEF) method is to increase comparability of environmental impacts of products within certain product categories by decreasing flexibility and therefore achieving reproducibility of results. Comparability is supposed to be further increased by developing product category specific rules (PEFCRs). The aim of this paper is to evaluate if the main goal of the PEF method has been achieved. This is done by a comprehensive analysis of the PEF guide, the current PEFCR guide, the developed PEFCRs, as well as the insights gained from participating in the pilot phase. The analysis reveals that the PEF method as well as its implementation in PEFCRs are not able to guarantee fair comparability due to shortcomings related to the (1) definition of product performance; (2) definition of the product category; (3) definition and determination of the representative product; (4) modeling of electricity; (5) requirements for the use of secondary data; (6) circular footprint formula; (7) life cycle impact assessment methods; and (8) approach to prioritize impact categories. For some of these shortcomings, recommendations for improvement are provided. This paper demonstrates that the PEF method has to be further improved to guarantee fair comparability.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   An Overview of Particulate Matter Measurement Instruments [J].
Amaral, Simone Simoes ;
de Carvalho, Joao Andrade, Jr. ;
Martins Costa, Maria Angelica ;
Pinheiro, Cleverson .
ATMOSPHERE, 2015, 6 (09) :1327-1345
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 14046 ISOFDIS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14025: Environmental labels and declarations
[4]  
Bayrische Landesanstalt fur Landwirtschaft, 2012, GRUB TAB FUTT MILCHK
[5]  
Berger M, 2016, LCA COMPEND, P73, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-7610-3_3
[6]   Water Footprint of European Cars: Potential Impacts of Water Consumption along Automobile Life Cycles [J].
Berger, Markus ;
Warsen, Jens ;
Krinke, Stephan ;
Bach, Vanessa ;
Finkbeiner, Matthias .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (07) :4091-4099
[7]   Introducing carrying capacity-based normalisation in LCA: framework and development of references at midpoint level [J].
Bjorn, Anders ;
Hauschild, Michael Zwicky .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (07) :1005-1018
[8]  
Bos U., 2016, LANCA Characterization Factors for Life Cycle Impact Assessment
[9]  
Boulay A. -M, 2016, ENV SCI TECHNO UNPUB, DOI [10.1007/s11367-017-1333-8, DOI 10.1007/S11367-017-1333-8]
[10]   A distance-to-target weighting method for Europe 2020 [J].
Castellani, Valentina ;
Benini, Lorenzo ;
Sala, Serenella ;
Pant, Rana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (08) :1159-1169