Who is responsible for Twitter's echo chamber problem? Evidence from 2016 US election networks

被引:57
作者
Guo, Lei [1 ]
Rohde, Jacob A. [1 ]
Wu, H. Denis [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Coll Commun, 640 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Twitter; presidential election; opinion leader; political homophily; network analysis; big data; OPINION LEADERS; SOCIAL MEDIA; 2-STEP FLOW; INFLUENTIALS; FEATHER; TWEET; BIRDS;
D O I
10.1080/1369118X.2018.1499793
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study examined the echo chamber phenomenon and opinion leadership on Twitter based on the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Network analysis and 'big data' analytics were employed to analyze more than 50 million tweets about the two presidential candidates, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, during the election cycle. Overall, the results suggested that Twitter communities discussing Trump and Clinton differed significantly in the level of political homogeneity and opinion leadership, and that certain opinion leaders were responsible of creating homogeneous communities on Twitter. This study made a theoretical contribution to the literature by linking opinion leadership and Twitter's network structure and shedding light on what may have caused the echo chamber problem to happen in an emerging media landscape.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 251
页数:18
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Andrews N., 2016, WALL STREET J
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, J EC PERSPECT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1962, THEORY COGNITIVE DIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1962, DIFFUSION INNOVATION
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, P INT C COMP SUPP CO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ANAL SOCIAL MEDIA NE
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, WALL STREET J
[9]  
Bessi A, 2016, First Monday, V21, P11, DOI DOI 10.5210/FM.V21I11.7090
[10]   Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship [J].
Boyd, Danah M. ;
Ellison, Nicole B. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, 2007, 13 (01) :210-230