Trigeminal and olfactory chemosensory impact of selected terpenes

被引:65
|
作者
Cometto-Muñiz, JE
Cain, WS
Abraham, MH
Kumarsingh, R
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Surg Orolaryngol, Chemosensory Percept Lab, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ London Univ Coll, Christopher Ingold Labs, Dept Chem, London WC1H 0AJ, England
关键词
chemosensory thresholds; odor; nasal lateralization; nasal irritation; eye irritation; anosmia; terpenes; olfaction; trigeminal nerve;
D O I
10.1016/S0091-3057(98)00054-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In Experiment 1, four normosmics and four anosmics (three congenital, one idiopathic) provided odor and nasal pungency thresholds, respectively, for the following terpenes: Delta(3)-carene, p-cymene, linalool, 1,8-cineole, and geraniol, plus the structurally related compound cumene. Additionally, all subjects provided nasal localization (i.e., right/left) and eye irritation thresholds. Trigeminally mediated thresholds (i.e., nasal pungency, nasal localization, and eye irritation) lay about three orders of magnitude above odor thresholds, which ranged between 0.1 and 1.7 ppm. The results implied uniform chemesthetic sensitivity across tasks and sites of impact. In Experiment 2, normosmics and anosmics provided odor and nasal pungency thresholds, respectively, for three pairs of isomeric terpenes: alpha- and gamma-terpinene, alpha- and beta-pinene, and R(+)- and S(-)-limonene. Odor thresholds ranged between 1.4 and 19 ppm, that is, about an order of magnitude higher than those of the previous terpenes, with no substantial differences between odor thresholds of members of a pair. Regarding chemesthetic impact, only alpha-terpinene evoked nasal pungency. The overall outcome suggests comparable trigeminal chemosensitivity between nose and eyes and between normosmics and anosmics, as shown before for homologous n-alcohols. It also lends support to a previously derived solvation model of the chemesthetic potency of airborne substances, and indicates the likely importance of certain molecular-size restrictions for effective trigeminal impact. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:765 / 770
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A second class of chemosensory receptors in the olfactory epithelium
    Liberles, Stephen D.
    Buck, Linda B.
    NATURE, 2006, 442 (7103) : 645 - 650
  • [32] Olfactory-trigeminal integration in the primary olfactory cortex
    Karunanayaka, Prasanna R.
    Lu, Jiaming
    Elyan, Rommy
    Yang, Qing X.
    Sathian, K.
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2024, 45 (10)
  • [33] Olfactory receptors in non-chemosensory tissues
    Kang, NaNa
    Koo, JaeHyung
    BMB REPORTS, 2012, 45 (11) : 612 - 622
  • [34] ION CHANNELS FROM CHEMOSENSORY OLFACTORY NEURONS
    LABARCA, P
    BACIGALUPO, J
    JOURNAL OF BIOENERGETICS AND BIOMEMBRANES, 1988, 20 (05) : 551 - 569
  • [35] CHEMOSENSORY SIGNALS AND THEIR RECEPTORS IN THE OLFACTORY NEURAL SYSTEM
    Ihara, S.
    Yoshikawa, K.
    Touhara, K.
    NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 254 : 45 - 60
  • [36] Chemosensory Information Processing between Keratinocytes and Trigeminal Neurons
    Sondersorg, Anna Christina
    Busse, Daniela
    Kyereme, Jessica
    Rothermel, Markus
    Neufang, Gitta
    Gisselmann, Guenter
    Hatt, Hanns
    Conrad, Heike
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2014, 289 (25) : 17529 - 17540
  • [37] Chemosensory additivity in trigeminal chemoreception as reflected by detection of mixtures
    J. Enrique Cometto-Muñiz
    William S. Cain
    Michael H. Abraham
    Experimental Brain Research, 2004, 158 : 196 - 206
  • [38] A second class of chemosensory receptors in the olfactory epithelium
    Stephen D. Liberles
    Linda B. Buck
    Nature, 2006, 442 : 645 - 650
  • [39] Chemosensory decrease in different forms of olfactory dysfunction
    Chloé Migneault-Bouchard
    Julien Wen Hsieh
    Marianne Hugentobler
    Johannes Frasnelli
    Basile Nicolas Landis
    Journal of Neurology, 2020, 267 : 138 - 143
  • [40] OLFACTORY (CHEMOSENSORY) EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS
    KOBAL, G
    HUMMEL, T
    TOXICOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL HEALTH, 1994, 10 (4-5) : 587 - 596