Diagnostic performance of choline PET/CT for the detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:17
|
作者
Guo, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Ling [1 ]
Hu, Junjie [3 ]
Feng, Dehong [1 ]
Xu, Lijuan [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Wuxi Peoples Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Wuxi, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Multidisciplinary Polyclin, Suzhou Dushuhu Publ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Wuxi Peoples Hosp, Dept Urol, Wuxi, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Med Univ, North Dist Suzhou Municipal Hosp, Affiliated Suzhou Hosp, Lab Ctr, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 09期
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; C-11-CHOLINE PET/CT; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SCINTIGRAPHY; RELAPSE; F-18; PSA; F-18-FLUOROCHOLINE; FLUOROCHOLINE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0203400
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the detection of bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched up to 20 February 2018 for studies that used 11C-choline or 18F-choline PET/CT for the detection of bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer and "histopathology and/or clinical follow-up" as the reference standard. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Pooled diagnostic accuracy with the 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using a bivariate random effects model. We also constructed hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves and performed meta-regression analyses. Results Fourteen studies with reasonable methodological quality were included in the analysis. On a per-patient basis, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were 0.89 (95% CI 0.80-0.94), 0.98 (95% CI 0.95-0.99), 40.4 (95% CI 19.7-82.6), 0.12 (95% CI 0.07-0.20), and 344 (95% CI 148-803), respectively. On a per-lesion basis, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR were 0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.94), 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.98), 34.1 (95% CI 20.0-58.1), 0.10 (95% CI 0.06-0.16), and 358 (95% CI 165-778), respectively. In the meta-regression analysis, the clinical setting (staging vs. restaging) was the only source of study heterogeneity on a per-patient basis. Conclusions Choline PET/CT shows excellent diagnostic performance for the detection of bone metastasis. However, a negative choline PET/CT result cannot ensure the lack of bone metastasis.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Bone Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Woo, Sungmin
    Suh, Chong Hyun
    Kim, Sang Youn
    Cho, Jeong Yeon
    Kim, Seung Hyup
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 73 (01) : 81 - 91
  • [2] Choline PET or PET/CT and Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Evangelista, Laura
    Zattoni, Fabio
    Guttilla, Andrea
    Saladini, Giorgio
    Zattoni, Filiberto
    Colletti, Patrick M.
    Rubello, Domenico
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2013, 38 (05) : 305 - 314
  • [3] Diagnostic performance of choline PET for detection of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands in hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Treglia, Giorgio
    Piccardo, Arnoldo
    Imperiale, Alessio
    Strobel, Klaus
    Kaufmann, Philipp A.
    Prior, John O.
    Giovanella, Luca
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2019, 46 (03) : 751 - 765
  • [4] Diagnostic performance of choline PET for detection of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands in hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Giorgio Treglia
    Arnoldo Piccardo
    Alessio Imperiale
    Klaus Strobel
    Philipp A. Kaufmann
    John O. Prior
    Luca Giovanella
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2019, 46 : 751 - 765
  • [5] 18F-NaF-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
    Sara Sheikhbahaei
    Krystyna M. Jones
    Rudolf A. Werner
    Roberto A. Salas-Fragomeni
    Charles V. Marcus
    Takahiro Higuchi
    Steven P. Rowe
    Lilja B. Solnes
    Mehrbod S. Javadi
    Annals of Nuclear Medicine, 2019, 33 : 351 - 361
  • [6] 18F-NaF-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
    Sheikhbahaei, Sara
    Jones, Krystyna M.
    Werner, Rudolf A.
    Salas-Fragomeni, Roberto A.
    Marcus, Charles, V
    Higuchi, Takahiro
    Rowe, Steven P.
    Solnes, Lilja B.
    Javadi, Mehrbod S.
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 33 (05) : 351 - 361
  • [7] The performance of 18F-PSMA PET/CT in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qin, Zhi-Qiang
    Pan, Gao-Jian
    Xu, Zheng
    Wang, Hao
    Xu, Lu-Wei
    Jia, Rui-Peng
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2022, 24 (04) : 373 - 379
  • [8] The Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Detection of Lymph Node Metastasis in Bladder and Prostate Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis
    Woo, Sungmin
    Suh, Chong Hyun
    Kim, Sang Youn
    Cho, Jeong Yeon
    Kim, Seung Hyup
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (03) : W95 - W109
  • [9] Diagnostic role of radiolabelled choline PET or PET/CT in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Francesco Bertagna
    Mattia Bertoli
    Giovanni Bosio
    Giorgio Biasiotto
    Ramin Sadeghi
    Raffaele Giubbini
    Giorgio Treglia
    Hepatology International, 2014, 8 : 493 - 500
  • [10] Diagnostic role of radiolabelled choline PET or PET/CT in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bertagna, Francesco
    Bertoli, Mattia
    Bosio, Giovanni
    Biasiotto, Giorgio
    Sadeghi, Ramin
    Giubbini, Raffaele
    Treglia, Giorgio
    HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 8 (04) : 493 - 500