Effect of Maternal Pethidine on Breast Feeding Behavior of Infants in Cesarean Section by Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:1
作者
Dejbakht, Majid [1 ]
Montaseri, Zohreh [2 ]
Saem, Jalal [3 ]
Rezaei, Mehrdad [4 ]
Akbarzadeh, Marzieh [5 ]
机构
[1] Gerash Univ Med Sci, Gerash Amir Al Momenin Med & Educ Ctr, Dept Nursing, Gerash, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Community Based Psychiat Care Res Ctr, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Nursing, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Dept Anesthesiologist & Intens Care, Shiraz, Iran
[4] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Res Ctr Neonatol, Dept Pediat, Shiraz, Iran
[5] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Maternal Fetal Med Res Ctr, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Midwifery, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
Breast feeding; Behavior; Cesarean section; Pethidine; Spinal; ANALGESIA; RATES;
D O I
10.34172/aim.2021.84
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Pain control methods after cesarean section may interfere with infant breast-feeding. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pethidine on breast feeding of infants born via cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. Methods: In this randomized double-blind clinical trial, we evaluated 116 infants born via cesarean section in Gerash Amiralmomenin hospital (Southern Iran) in 2017. The subjects were selected through purposive sampling and randomly by permuted block randomization and assigned to intervention and control groups. The test group received 100 mg of pethidine as intravenous infusion and the control group received only routine cares. Infants' breast feeding behavior in both groups was recorded within 48 hours of hospitalization, using the standard tool for rapid assessment of infant feeding behavior, which consists of 4 main components of breastfeeding, including readiness to feed, rooting, latching, and sucking with a score range of 0 to 3 for each component evaluated at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours postnatally. Data were analyzed using independent t tests and chi-square test. Results: the highest score of breast-feeding behavior pertained to sucking reflexes in the control group and the lowest score to breast feeding readiness in the pethidine group. Readiness for feeding in the control group (2.09 +/- 0.53) was significantly higher than the pethidine group (1.81 +/- 0.61) (95% CI: 0.0552, 0.5092 and P=0.015). Sucking reflex (95% CI: -0.1461, 0.2208 and P=0.687), latching (95% CI: -0.3012, 0.0345 and P=0.118) and rooting reflexes (95% CI: -0.1685, 0.2342 and P=0.747) were almost equal in the control group (2.54 +/- 0.49, 2.52 +/- 0.38, 2.5 +/- 0.48, respectively) and pethidine groups (2.51 +/- 0.43, 2.65 +/- 0.45, 2.46 +/- 0.53, respectively). The total score of feeding behavior in the control group (9.66 +/- 1.04) was higher than that of the pethidine group (9.44 +/-.69) (95% CI: -0.2032, 0.6412 and P =0.306). There was no significant difference between the infants feeding frequency (95% CI: -0.269, 1.930 and P=0.137) and duration of feeding (95% CI: -3.2067, 0.4597 and P=0.14). Conclusion: Evaluation of infants in the first 48 hours after birth showed that those babies whose mothers received pethidine were less willing to start breast-feeding. However, other components of breast-feeding behaviors were similar.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 598
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Adekanle D, 2013, OPEN J OBSTET GYNECO, P357, DOI DOI 10.4236/OJOG.2013.33066
[2]  
Al-Mabslai R, 2011, SULTAN QABOOS U MED, V11, P291
[3]   Estimation of infant dose and exposure to pethidine and norpethidine via breast milk following patient-controlled epidural pethidine for analgesia post caesarean delivery [J].
Al-Tamimi, Y. ;
Ilett, K. F. ;
Paech, M. J. ;
O'Halloran, S. J. ;
Hartmann, P. E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2011, 20 (02) :128-134
[4]   Cesarean Section Beyond Cesar's Borders: A Mini Review on the Cultural History of Cesarean Section High Prevalence Rates in the Middle East [J].
Azimirad, Afshin .
ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, 2020, 23 (05) :335-337
[5]   Association between Intrapartum Interventions and Breastfeeding Duration [J].
Bai, Dorothy Li ;
Wu, Kendra M. ;
Tarrant, Marie .
JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2013, 58 (01) :25-32
[6]  
Beiranvand S, 2014, MODERN CARE J, V10, P288
[7]  
Burchell T., 2016, Evidence-based Midwifery, V14, P49
[8]  
Cobb Benjamin, 2015, Transl Perioper Pain Med, V1, P1
[9]  
Direkvand-Moghadam A, 2015, BIOMED PHARMACOL J, V6, P161, DOI [10.13005/ bpj/399, DOI 10.13005/BPJ/399]
[10]  
Foruzeshfard M, 2013, Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil, V15, P1