The clinical use of buprenorphine in opiate addiction: evidence and practice

被引:19
作者
Law, FD
Myles, JS
Daglish, MRC
Nutt, DJ
机构
[1] Blackberry Hill Hosp, Bristol Specialist Drug Serv, Avon & Wiltshire Mental Hlth Partnership NHS Trus, Bristol BS16 2EW, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Psychopharmacol Unit, Div Psychiat, Bristol BS1 3NY, Avon, England
[3] St George Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Addict Behav & Psychol Med, London SW17 0RE, England
来源
ACTA NEUROPSYCHIATRICA | 2004年 / 16卷 / 05期
关键词
alpha-2 adrenergic agonists; Buprenorphine; clinical; detoxification; maintenance; methadone; opiates; partial mu-opioid receptor agonist; Subutex; treatment;
D O I
10.1111/j.0924-2708.2004.00095.x
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Buprenorphine is a partial mu-opioid receptor agonist that is being increasingly used in clinical practice in the treatment of opioid dependence in the UK, USA, and, elsewhere. Its unique pharmacological properties mean it is a relatively safe drug, it can be given by alternate day dispensing, and it is associated with relatively mild symptoms on withdrawal. The interpretation of the research literature on buprenorphine is however, complex, and often appears to be in conflict with how buprenorphine is used in clinical practice. This article describes these apparent contradictions, their likely explanations, and how these may further inform our clinical practice. The article also describes the clinically relevant pharmacological properties of buprenorphine, compares it to methadone, relates the evidence to clinical experience, and provides practical advice on how to manage the most common clinical techniques. The best quality evidence suggests that very rapid buprenorphine induction is not associated with a higher drop-out rate than methadone, that buprenorphine is probably as good as methadone for maintenance treatment, and is superior to methadone and alpha-2 adrenergic agonists for detoxification. However, buprenorphine cannot yet be considered the 'gold standard' treatment for opiate dependence because of the higher drop-out rates that may occur on induction using current techniques, its high-cost relative to methadone, and because the place of buprenorphine in treatment IS Still continuing to evolve.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 274
页数:29
相关论文
共 168 条
[1]   Alternate-day buprenorphine dosing is preferred to daily dosing by opioid-dependent humans [J].
Amass, L ;
Bickel, WK ;
Crean, JP ;
Blake, J ;
Higgins, ST .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 136 (03) :217-225
[2]   Thrice-weekly supervised dosing with the combination buprenorphine-naloxone tablet is preferred to daily supervised dosing by opioid-dependent humans [J].
Amass, L ;
Kamien, JB ;
Mikulich, SK .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2001, 61 (02) :173-181
[3]   Efficacy of daily and alternate-day dosing regimens with the combination buprenorphine-naloxone tablet [J].
Amass, L ;
Kamien, JB ;
Mikulich, SK .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2000, 58 (1-2) :143-152
[4]  
Andrews HL, 1944, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V81, P288
[5]  
[Anonymous], BUPRENORPHINE COMBAT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Methadone Maintenance Treatment and Other Opioid Replacement Therapies
[7]   Deaths attributable to methadone vs buprenorphine in France [J].
Auriacombe, M ;
Franques, P ;
Tignol, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (01) :45-45
[8]   THE VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORTED HEROIN USE [J].
BALE, RN ;
VANSTONE, WW ;
ENGELSING, TMJ ;
ZARCONE, VP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ADDICTIONS, 1981, 16 (08) :1387-1398
[9]  
BANKS A, 1988, DRUG MISUSE PRACTICA
[10]   A meta-analysis comparing buprenorphine to methadone for treatment of opiate dependence [J].
Barnett, PG ;
Rodgers, JH ;
Bloch, DA .
ADDICTION, 2001, 96 (05) :683-690