Patient-Reported Outcome Measures are not a Valid Proxy for Patient Satisfaction in Total Joint Arthroplasty

被引:16
作者
Halawi, Mohamad J. [1 ]
Jongbloed, Walter [2 ]
Baron, Samuel [2 ]
Savoy, Lawrence [1 ]
Cote, Mark P. [1 ]
Lieberman, Jay R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Hlth Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Sch Med, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
关键词
arthroplasty; patient-reported outcome measures; satisfaction; quality; value medicine; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; COST-EFFECTIVENESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.033
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used as quality benchmarks in total joint arthroplasty. The objective of this study is to investigate whether PROMs correlate with patient satisfaction, which is arguably the most important and desired outcome. Methods: Our institutional joint database was queried for patients who underwent primary, elective, unilateral total joint arthroplasty. Eligible patients were asked to complete a satisfaction survey at final follow-up. Correlation coefficients (R) were calculated to quantify the relationship between patient satisfaction and prospectively collected PROMs. We explored a wide range of PROMs including Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short Form-12, Oxford Hip Score, Knee Society Clinical Rating Score (KSCRS), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation, and University of California Los Angeles activity level rating. Results: In general, there was only weak to moderate correlation between patient satisfaction and PROMs. Querying the absolute postoperative scores had higher correlation with patient satisfaction compared to either preoperative scores or net changes in scores. The correlation was higher with disease-specific PROMs (WOMAC, Oxford Hip Score, KSCRS) compared to general health (Short Form-12), activity level (University of California Los Angeles activity level rating), or perception of normalcy (Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation). Within disease-specific PROMs, the pain domain consistently carried the highest correlation with patient satisfaction (WOMAC pain subscale, R = 0.45, P < .001; KSCRS pain subscale, R = 0.49, P < .001). Conclusion: There is only weak to moderate correlation between PROMs and patient satisfaction. PROMs alone are not the optimal way to evaluate patient satisfaction. We recommend directly querying patients about satisfaction and using shorter PROMs, particularly disease-specific PROMs that assess pain perception to better gauge patient satisfaction. (c) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 339
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Negative impact of waiting time for primary total knee arthroplasty on satisfaction and patient-reported outcome
    Lizaur-Utrilla, Alejandro
    Martinez-Mendez, Daniel
    Miralles-Munoz, Fernando A.
    Marco-Gomez, Luis
    Lopez-Prats, Fernando A.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 40 (11) : 2303 - 2307
  • [22] Patient-reported Outcome Measurement for Patients With Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Lyman, Stephen
    Yin, Kaitlyn L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2017, 25 : S44 - S47
  • [23] Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in US Total Joint Replacement Registries: Rationale, Status, and Plans
    Franklin, Patricia D.
    Lewallen, David
    Bozic, Kevin
    Hallstrom, Brian
    Jiranek, William
    Ayers, David C.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 96A : 104 - 109
  • [24] Patient experience with patient-reported outcome measures in neurologic practice
    Lapin, Brittany
    Udeh, Belinda
    Bautista, Jocelyn F.
    Katzan, Irene L.
    NEUROLOGY, 2018, 91 (12) : E1135 - E1151
  • [25] The use of patient-reported outcome measures and patient satisfaction ratings to assess outcome in hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder
    Rees, J. L.
    Dawson, J.
    Hand, G. C. R.
    Cooper, C.
    Judge, A.
    Price, A. J.
    Beard, D. J.
    Carr, A. J.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2010, 92B (08): : 1107 - 1111
  • [26] Responsiveness and Internal Validity of Common Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Sciascia, Aaron D.
    Morris, Brent J.
    Jacobs, Cale A.
    Edwards, T. Bradley
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 40 (03) : E513 - E519
  • [27] Do Patient Engagement Platforms in Total Joint Arthroplasty Improve Patient-Reported Outcomes?
    Holte, Andrew J.
    Molloy, Ilda B.
    Werth, Paul M.
    Jevsevar, David S.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (12) : 3850 - 3858
  • [28] The use of patient-reported outcome measures in hip and knee arthroplasty in Alberta
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    Jin, Xuejing
    Pittman, Lindsay B.
    Smith, Christopher J.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2021, 5 (SUPPL 2)
  • [29] The utility of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of patient-reported outcome measures following primary hip and knee total joint arthroplasty
    Klemt, Christian
    Uzosike, Akachimere Cosmas
    Esposito, John G.
    Harvey, Michael Joseph
    Yeo, Ingwon
    Subih, Murad
    Kwon, Young-Min
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (04) : 2235 - 2245
  • [30] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Endometriosis
    Nicolas-Boluda, Alba
    Oppenheimer, Anne
    Bouaziz, Jerome
    Fauconnier, Arnaud
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (21)