Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of mindful eating questionnaire in women who seeking weight reduction

被引:13
作者
Abbaspoor, Zahra [1 ]
Javadifar, Nahid [2 ]
Miryan, Mahsa [3 ]
Abedi, Parvin [4 ]
机构
[1] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Midwifery Dept, Reprod Hlth Promot Res Ctr, Ahvaz, Iran
[2] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Reprod Hlth Promot Res Ctr, Ahvaz, Iran
[3] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Fac Paramed, Nutr, Ahvaz, Iran
[4] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Andropause Res Ctr, Menopause, Ahvaz, Iran
来源
JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS | 2018年 / 6卷
关键词
Mindfulness eating; Questionnaires; Reliability; Validity; ATTENTION AWARENESS SCALE; VALIDATION; BENEFITS; VALIDITY; FACETS;
D O I
10.1186/s40337-018-0220-4
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to test the validity, reliability and factor structure of the original Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ) for use in an Iranian population.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study conducted on 150 women who attended four athletic gyms and met the inclusion criteria in Ahvaz city in July of 2015. After linguistic validation of the Iranian version of the MEQ, the content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI) were assessed by an expert panel. Then, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on the scale constructs and scale reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) was assessed with respect to the psychometric properties of the scale.ResultsThe CVR and CVI scores for the MEQ were 0.89 and 0.93, respectively. EFA loaded all 28-items with a 5-factor solution (awareness', distraction', disinhibition', emotional response' and external cues') that jointly accounted for 53.78% of the observed variance. The results of the EFA supported the item When a restaurant portion is too large, I stop eating when I'm full' being placed in the external cues rather than the disinhibition subscale. This displacement improved the reliability coefficient for this subscale.The results of internal consistency analysis, including Cronbach's alpha (ranging from 0.73 to 0.81) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ranging from 0.73 to 0.91) were satisfactory.ConclusionsThe Persian version of the MEQ appears to be valid and reliable; therefore, it can be an effective tool in designing mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of individuals with eating disorders, overweight and obesity in an Iranian population.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1996, APPL MULTIVARIATE TE
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, STAT METHODS HLTH CA
  • [3] Critical Values for Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio: Revisiting the Original Methods of Calculation
    Ayre, Colin
    Scally, Andrew John
    [J]. MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 47 (01) : 79 - 86
  • [4] Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness
    Baer, RA
    Smith, GT
    Hopkins, J
    Krietemeyer, J
    Toney, L
    [J]. ASSESSMENT, 2006, 13 (01) : 27 - 45
  • [5] Baio Jon, 2012, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V61, P1
  • [6] BENTLER PM, 1980, PSYCHOL BULL, V88, P588, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  • [7] The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being
    Brown, KW
    Ryan, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 84 (04) : 822 - 848
  • [8] Confirmatory factor analysis and examination of the psychometric properties of the eating beliefs questionnaire
    Burton, Amy L.
    Hay, Phillipa
    Kleitman, Sabina
    Smith, Evelyn
    Raman, Jayanthi
    Swinbourne, Jessica
    Touyz, Stephen W.
    Abbott, Maree J.
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 17
  • [9] Validation of the mindful attention awareness scale in a cancer population
    Carlson, LE
    Brown, KW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2005, 58 (01) : 29 - 33
  • [10] Psychometric properties of the Spanish validation of the Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)
    Cebolla, A.
    Garcia-Palacios, A.
    Soler, J.
    Guillen, V.
    Banos, R.
    Botella, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 26 (02) : 118 - 126