Differences in genome size between closely related species:: The Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup

被引:47
|
作者
Boulesteix, M
Weiss, M
Biémont, C
机构
[1] Univ Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5558, Lab Biometrie & Biol Evolut, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
[2] Univ Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5534, Ctr Genet Mol & Cellulaire, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
关键词
Drosophila; genome size; phylogeny; transposable elements; satellite DNA;
D O I
10.1093/molbev/msj012
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Genome size varies considerably among organisms due to differences in the amplification, deletion, and divergence of various kinds of repetitive sequences, including the transposable elements, which constitute a large fraction of the genome. However, while the changes in genome size observed at a wide taxonomic level have been thoroughly investigated, we still know little about the process involved in closely related species. We estimated genome sizes and the reverse transcriptase-related sequence (RTRS) content in the nine species of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. We showed that the species differ with regard to their genome size and that the RTRS content is correlated with genome size for all species except Drosophila orena. The genome of D. orena, which is 1.6-fold as big as that of D. melanogaster, has in fact not undergone any major increase in its RTRS content.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 167
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] RESISTANCE OF SPECIES OF THE DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER SUBGROUP TO ENVIRONMENTAL EXTREMES
    STANLEY, SM
    PARSONS, PA
    SPENCE, GE
    WEBER, L
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1980, 28 (03) : 413 - 421
  • [23] MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA EVOLUTION IN THE MELANOGASTER SPECIES SUBGROUP OF DROSOPHILA
    SOLIGNAC, M
    MONNEROT, M
    MOUNOLOU, JC
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION, 1986, 23 (01) : 31 - 40
  • [24] Cytological differences between closely species
    Nath, V
    NATURE, 1932, 130 : 204 - 204
  • [25] Analysis of drosophila species genome size and satellite DNA content reveals significant differences among strains as well as between species
    Bosco, Giovanni
    Campbell, Paula
    Leiva-Neto, Joao T.
    Markow, Therese A.
    GENETICS, 2007, 177 (03) : 1277 - 1290
  • [26] Principles of genome evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster species group
    Ranz, Jose M.
    Maurin, Damien
    Chan, Yuk S.
    von Grotthuss, Marcin
    Hillier, LaDeana W.
    Roote, John
    Ashburner, Michael
    Bergman, Casey M.
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2007, 5 (06) : 1366 - 1381
  • [27] INTERSPECIFIC DIFFERENCES IN PHOTOSENSITIVITY BETWEEN 3 CLOSELY RELATED SPECIES OF PIGEONS
    LOFTS, B
    MURTON, RK
    WESTWOOD, NJ
    JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1967, 151 : 17 - &
  • [28] ISOENZYME DIFFERENCES BETWEEN 3 CLOSELY RELATED SPECIES OF LINEUS (HETERONEMERTEA)
    WILLIAMS, KA
    SKIBINSKI, DOF
    GIBSON, R
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY, 1983, 66 (03) : 207 - 211
  • [29] Light wavelength dependency of mating activity in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup
    Sakai, T
    Isono, K
    Tomaru, M
    Fukatami, A
    Oguma, Y
    GENES & GENETIC SYSTEMS, 2002, 77 (03) : 187 - 195
  • [30] Evolution of Eye Morphology and Rhodopsin Expression in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Subgroup
    Posnien, Nico
    Hopfen, Corinna
    Hilbrant, Maarten
    Ramos-Womack, Margarita
    Murat, Sophie
    Schoenauer, Anna
    Herbert, Samantha L.
    Nunes, Maria D. S.
    Arif, Saad
    Breuker, Casper J.
    Schloetterer, Christian
    Mitteroecker, Philipp
    McGregor, Alistair P.
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (05):