The impact of driving time on participation in colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy and faecal immunochemical blood test

被引:5
作者
Berthelsen, Mona [1 ]
Berstad, Paula [1 ,7 ]
Randel, Kristin R. [1 ]
Hoff, Geir [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Natvig, Erik [1 ]
Holme, Oyvind [4 ,5 ]
Botteri, Edoardo [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Canc Registry Norway, Sect Colorectal Canc Screening, POB 5313 Majorstuen, N-0304 Oslo, Norway
[2] Telemark Hosp Trust, Dept Res & Dev, Ulefossvegen 55, N-3710 Skien, Norway
[3] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, POB 1171 Blindern, N-0318 Oslo, Norway
[4] Sorlandet Hosp, Dept Med, POB 416 Lundsiden, N-4604 Kristiansand, Norway
[5] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth & Soc, POB 1130 Blindern, N-1130 Oslo, Norway
[6] Canc Registry Norway, Dept Res, POB 5313 Majorstuen, N-0304 Oslo, Norway
[7] Canc Registry Norway, POB 5313 Majorstuen, N-0304 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Colorectal cancer screening; Driving time; Faecal immunochemical test; Participation; Sigmoidoscopy; BREAST-CANCER; DISPARITIES; POPULATION; PREDICTORS; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.canep.2022.102244
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: High participation rates are important for a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme to be effective. Having a long travelling distance to screening centres may impede participation.Methods: We analysed the association between driving time from home address to screening centre and participation among individuals invited to screening with faecal immunochemical test (FIT) (n = 68,624) or sigmoidoscopy (n = 46,076) in a randomized trial in Norway in 2012-17. Two screening centres were involved. We fitted multiple logistic regression models, adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic and health characteristics, and reported odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Participation rates were 58.9 % (n = 40,445) for FIT and 51.9 % (n = 23,911) for sigmoidoscopy. In sigmoidoscopy, participation was 56.9 % and 47.9 % in those living < 20 and > 60 min by car from the screening centres, respectively. For each 10 min driving time increase, OR for participating in sigmoidoscopy screening was 0.93 (95 % CI 0.91-0.95). There was a significant difference between the two screening centres (p-value for heterogeneity <0.001). Participation in FIT screening were 61.2 % and 57.1 % in those with < 20 and > 60 min driving time, respectively, and the OR was 0.98 (95 % CI 0.96-0.99) for each 10 min increase (heterogeneity between screening methods, P-value <0.001). Among those with a positive FIT, compliance to colonoscopy was higher in those living < 20 compared to > 60 min from the centres (95.1 % vs. 92.9 %, respectively, OR 0.86; 95 % CI 0.77-0.93 for each 10 min increase).Conclusions: Driving time to screening centre was a significant predictor of participation, mainly in sigmoidoscopy. There were local differences in the impact of driving time on participation. Driving time also affected compliance to colonoscopy after a positive FIT. When planning a CRC screening programme, one should consider offering people living far from screening sites special assistance to facilitate their participation.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Rural vs Urban Residence Affects Risk-Appropriate Colorectal Cancer Screening [J].
Anderson, Allison E. ;
Henry, Kevin A. ;
Samadder, N. Jewel ;
Merrill, Ray M. ;
Kinney, Anita Y. .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 11 (05) :526-533
[2]  
[Anonymous], The GeoNames geographical database
[3]   Characteristics of nonparticipants in a randomised colorectal cancer screening trial comparing sigmoidoscopy and faecal immunochemical testing [J].
Botteri, Edoardo ;
Hoff, Geir ;
Randel, Kristin R. ;
Holme, Oyvind ;
de Lange, Thomas ;
Bernklev, Tomm ;
Aas, Eline ;
Berthelsen, Mona ;
Natvig, Erik ;
Kirkoen, Benedicte ;
Knudsen, Markus D. ;
Kvaerner, Ane S. ;
Schult, Anna L. ;
Ursin, Giske ;
Jorgensen, Anita ;
Berstad, Paula .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 151 (03) :361-371
[4]   Urban-rural disparities in colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of 1998-2005 data from the Centers for Disease Control's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study [J].
Cole, Allison M. ;
Jackson, J. Elizabeth ;
Doescher, Mark .
CANCER MEDICINE, 2012, 1 (03) :350-356
[5]   Geographic and population-level disparities in colorectal cancer testing: A multilevel analysis of Medicaid and commercial claims data [J].
Davis, Melinda M. ;
Renfro, Stephanie ;
Pham, Robyn ;
Lich, Kristen Hassmiller ;
Shannon, Jackilen ;
Coronado, Gloria D. ;
Wheeler, Stephanie B. .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 101 :44-52
[6]   Socioeconomic and ethnic inequities within organised colorectal cancer screening programmes worldwide [J].
de Klerk, C. M. ;
Gupta, S. ;
Dekker, E. ;
Essink-Bot, M. L. .
GUT, 2018, 67 (04) :679-687
[7]   The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) screening study [J].
Gondal, G ;
Grotmol, T ;
Hofstad, B ;
Bretthauer, M ;
Eide, TJ ;
Hoff, G .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 38 (06) :635-642
[8]   Effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in men and women and different age groups: pooled analysis of randomised trials [J].
Holme, Oyvind ;
Schoen, Robert E. ;
Senore, Carlo ;
Segnan, Nereo ;
Hoff, Geir ;
Loberg, Magnus ;
Bretthauer, Michael ;
Adami, Hans-Olov ;
Kalager, Mette .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 356
[9]   Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals [J].
Holme, Oyvind ;
Bretthauer, Michael ;
Fretheim, Atle ;
Odgaard-Jensen, Jan ;
Hoff, Geir .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (09)
[10]  
James TM, 2006, ETHNIC DIS, V16, P228