Case identification of depression in patients with chronic physical health problems: a diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of 113 studies

被引:97
作者
Meader, Nicholas [1 ]
Mitchell, Alex J. [1 ]
Chew-Graham, Carolyn [1 ]
Goldberg, David [1 ]
Rizzo, Maria [1 ]
Bird, Victoria [1 ]
Kessler, David [1 ]
Packham, Jon [1 ]
Haddad, Mark [1 ]
Pilling, Stephen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Ctr Reviews & Disseminat, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
SELF-REPORT QUESTIONNAIRES; REPORT SCREENING MEASURES; CASE-FINDING INSTRUMENTS; CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE; INVENTORY-SHORT-FORM; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; GERIATRIC DEPRESSION; PRIMARY-CARE; MAJOR DEPRESSION; MENTAL-DISORDERS;
D O I
10.3399/bjgp11X613151
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Depression is more likely in patients with chronic physical illness, and is associated with increased rates of disability and mortality. Effective treatment of depression may reduce morbidity and mortality. The use of two stem questions for case finding in diabetes and coronary heart disease is advocated in the Quality and Outcomes Framework, and has become normalised into primary care. Aim: To define the most effective tool for use in consultations to detect depression in people with chronic physical illness. Design: Meta-analysis. Method: The following data sources were searched: CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, HMIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Knowledge, from inception to July 2009. Three authors selected studies that examined identification tools and used an interview-based ICD (International Classification of Diseases) or DSM (Diagnostic and statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) diagnosis of depression as reference standard. At least two authors independently extracted study characteristics and outcome data and assessed methodological quality. Results: A total of 113 studies met the eligibility criteria, providing data on 20 826 participants. It was found that two stem questions, PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire), the Zung, and GHQ-28 (General Health Questionnaire) were the optimal measures for case identification, but no method was sufficiently accurate to recommend as a definitive case-finding tool. Limitations were the moderate-to-high heterogeneity for most scales and the facts that few studies used ICD diagnoses as the reference standard, and that a variety of methods were used to determine DSM diagnoses. Conclusion: Assessing both validity and ease of use, the two stem questions are the preferred method. However, clinicians should not rely on the two-questions approach alone, but should be confident to engage in a more detailed clinical assessment of patients who score positively.
引用
收藏
页码:e808 / e820
页数:2
相关论文
共 181 条
[1]   Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SCL-90, and Hamilton depression rating scale as screening instruments for depression in stroke patients [J].
Aben, I ;
Verhey, F ;
Lousberg, R ;
Lodder, J ;
Honig, A .
PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2002, 43 (05) :386-393
[2]   COMPARISON OF 6 DEPRESSION RATING-SCALES IN GERIATRIC STROKE PATIENTS [J].
AGRELL, B ;
DEHLIN, O .
STROKE, 1989, 20 (09) :1190-1194
[3]   Screening for depression in terminally ill cancer patients in Japan [J].
Akechi, T ;
Okuyama, T ;
Sugawara, Y ;
Shima, Y ;
Furukawa, TA ;
Uchitomi, Y .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2006, 31 (01) :5-12
[4]   Development of a brief screening interview for adjustment disorders and major depression in patients with cancer [J].
Akizuki, N ;
Akechi, T ;
Nakanishi, T ;
Yoshikawa, E ;
Okamura, M ;
Nakano, T ;
Murakami, Y ;
Uchitomi, Y .
CANCER, 2003, 97 (10) :2605-2613
[5]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[6]  
[Anonymous], QUAL OUTC FRAM
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI)
[8]  
ARAGONES E, 2001, INT J PSYCHIAT MED, V34, P331
[9]  
Aydin IO, 2001, GEN HOSP PSYCHIAT, V23, P77
[10]   Screening for major depression disorders in medical inpatients with the Beck Depression Inventory for Primary Care [J].
Beck, AT ;
Guth, D ;
Steer, RA ;
Ball, R .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1997, 35 (08) :785-791