Do the sentencing guidelines influence the retirement decisions of federal judges?

被引:27
作者
Boylan, RT [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Culverhouse Coll Commerce & Business Adm, Dept Econ & Finance, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/380411
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Many U.S. district court judges have expressed dissatisfaction with the sentencing guidelines. Such feelings are consistent with the assumption that judges care about power, not being overturned, and sentences being proportional to the offense. This paper shows that the sentencing guidelines lead judges to take senior status earlier. Specifically, under the sentencing guidelines, district court judges take senior status .4 years after becoming eligible to do so. Without the sentencing guidelines, district court judges would select senior status 3 years after becoming eligible.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 253
页数:23
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Measuring interjudge sentencing disparity: Before and after the federal sentencing guidelines [J].
Anderson, JM ;
Kling, JR ;
Stith, K .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1999, 42 (01) :271-307
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, FEDERAL COURTS CHALL
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT REV LAW EC
[4]   POLITICS AND THE JUDICIARY - THE INFLUENCE OF JUDICIAL BACKGROUND ON CASE OUTCOMES [J].
ASHENFELTER, O ;
EISENBERG, T ;
SCHWAB, SJ .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 1995, 24 (02) :257-281
[5]  
BAKER KJ, 2000, J LAW POLITICS, V16, P139
[6]   AN INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF TURNOVER IN THE LOWER FEDERAL-COURTS, 1900-1987 [J].
BARROW, DJ ;
ZUK, G .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1990, 52 (02) :457-476
[7]  
Bowman FO, 2002, IOWA LAW REV, V87, P477
[8]  
Bowman FO, 2001, IOWA LAW REV, V86, P1043
[9]   THE JOINT CHOICE OF RETIREMENT AGE AND POSTRETIREMENT HOURS OF WORK [J].
BURTLESS, G ;
MOFFITT, RA .
JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 1985, 3 (02) :209-236
[10]  
COHEN MA, 1991, J LAW ECON ORGAN, V7, P183