Using temporomandibular joint mobility to predict difficult tracheal intubation

被引:12
作者
Sahin, Sevtap Hekimoglu [1 ]
Yilmaz, Ali [2 ]
Gunday, Isil [1 ]
Kargi, Murat [1 ]
Sut, Necdet [3 ]
Taskinalp, Oguz [2 ]
Ulucam, Enis [2 ]
机构
[1] Trakya Univ Med Fac, Dept Anaesthesiol & Reanimat, TR-22030 Edirne, Turkey
[2] Trakya Univ Med Fac, Dept Anat, TR-22030 Edirne, Turkey
[3] Trakya Univ Med Fac, Dept Biostat, TR-22030 Edirne, Turkey
关键词
General anesthesia; Laryngoscopy; Airway assessment tests; Tracheal intubation; RESPIRATORY EVENTS; ANESTHESIA; AIRWAY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00540-011-1126-3
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The aim of this prospective study was to determine the reliability of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) mobility measurements for predicting difficult intubation. To evaluate the accuracy in predicting difficult intubation by TMJ mobility measurement, 762 patients requiring general anesthesia with tracheal intubation for elective surgery were enrolled in this prospective, observational, single-blind study. Maximum mouth opening, right-left jaw excursion, and degrees of protraction were determined with a digital inclinometer. Incisor gap was measured using a vernier caliper during full mouth opening. After induction of anesthesia using a standard protocol, the patient's grade of laryngeal view by Cormack-Lehane classification was documented by an anesthesiologist. We found that the degrees of protraction and incisor gap in the easy intubation group were significantly higher than those in the difficult intubation group. The incisor gap was found to be more sensitive (88.37%) and more specific (95.71%) than protraction degrees (58.14% and 59.76%, respectively). The results revealed that measurements of the incisor gap and degrees of protraction may be useful routine screening tests for preoperative prediction of difficult intubation.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 461
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], ANESTHESIOLOGY
  • [2] Mouth opening - A new angle
    Calder, I
    Picard, J
    Chapman, M
    O'Sullivan, C
    Crockard, HA
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 99 (04) : 799 - 801
  • [3] ADVERSE RESPIRATORY EVENTS IN ANESTHESIA - A CLOSED CLAIMS ANALYSIS
    CAPLAN, RA
    POSNER, KL
    WARD, RJ
    CHENEY, FW
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 72 (05) : 828 - 833
  • [4] Risk factors assessment of the difficult airway: An Italian survey of 1956 patients
    Cattano, D
    Panicucci, E
    Paolicchi, A
    Forfori, F
    Giunta, F
    Hagberg, C
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 99 (06) : 1774 - 1779
  • [5] DIFFICULT TRACHEAL INTUBATION IN OBSTETRICS
    CORMACK, RS
    LEHANE, J
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1984, 39 (11) : 1105 - 1111
  • [6] The unanticipated difficult airway with recommendations for management
    Crosby, ET
    Cooper, RM
    Douglas, MJ
    Doyle, DJ
    Hung, OR
    Labrecque, P
    Muir, H
    Murphy, MF
    Preston, RP
    Rose, DK
    Roy, L
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1998, 45 (08): : 757 - 776
  • [7] Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation
    Iohom, G
    Ronayne, M
    Cunningham, AJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 20 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [8] Predicting difficult intubation - A comprehensive scoring system
    Nath, G
    Sekar, M
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1997, 25 (05) : 482 - 486
  • [9] Sternomental distance as the sole predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in obstetric anaesthesia
    Ramadhani, SAL
    Mohamed, LA
    Rocke, DA
    Gouws, E
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 77 (03) : 312 - 316
  • [10] Inter-observer agreement of tests used for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy/tracheal intubation
    Rosenstock, C
    Gillesberg, I
    Gätke, MR
    Levin, D
    Kristensen, MS
    Rasmussen, LS
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 49 (08) : 1057 - 1062