Hydrogen vs. Batteries: Comparative Safety Assessments for a High-Speed Passenger Ferry

被引:6
作者
Mylonopoulos, Foivos [1 ]
Boulougouris, Evangelos [1 ]
Trivyza, Nikoletta L. [1 ]
Priftis, Alexandros [1 ]
Cheliotis, Michail [1 ]
Wang, Haibin [1 ]
Shi, Guangyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Maritime Safety Res Ctr, Dept Naval Architecture Ocean & Marine Engn, Glasgow G4 0LZ, Lanark, Scotland
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 06期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
liquefied hydrogen; batteries; high-speed ferry; safety; hazard identification; quantitative risk assessments; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; FUEL; OPTIMIZATION; PROPULSION; HYBRID; SYSTEM; IMPACT; SHIP;
D O I
10.3390/app12062919
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Batteries and hydrogen constitute two of the most promising solutions for decarbonising international shipping. This paper presents the comparison between a battery and a proton-exchange membrane hydrogen fuel cell version of a high-speed catamaran ferry with a main focus on safety. The systems required for each version are properly sized and fitted according to the applicable rules, and their impact on the overall design is discussed. Hazards for both designs were identified; frequency and consequence indexes for them were input qualitatively, following Novel Technology Qualification and SOLAS Alternative Designs and Arrangements, while certain risk control options were proposed in order to reduce the risks of the most concerned accidental events. The highest ranked risks were analysed by quantitative risk assessments in PyroSim software. The gas dispersion analysis performed for the hydrogen version indicated that it is crucial for the leakage in the fuel cell room to be stopped within 1 s after being detected to prevent the formation of explosive masses under full pipe rupture of 33 mm diameter, even with 120 air changes per hour. For the battery version, the smoke/fire simulation in the battery room indicated that the firefighting system could achieve a 30% reduction in fire duration, with firedoors closed and ventilation shut, compared to the scenario without a firefighting system.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
3M&TRADE, NOVEC TRADE 1230 FIR
[2]   Concept risk assessment of a hydrogen driven high speed passenger ferry [J].
Aarskog, Fredrik G. ;
Hansen, Olav R. ;
Stromgren, Trond ;
Ulleberg, Oystein .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (02) :1359-1372
[3]  
Andersson P., 2017, Tech. Rep.
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Revised Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for Use in the IMO Rule-Making Process
[5]  
[Anonymous], COMSOL M CHALLENGES
[6]  
Blaylock M., 2018, Sandia Report: SAND2018-0585
[7]  
Boulougouris E., 2020, P 8 TRANSP RES AR TR
[8]  
Boulougouris E., 2021, SNAME MARITIME C SMC, DOI [10.5957/SMC-2021-030, DOI 10.5957/SMC-2021-030]
[9]   Dynamic analysis of PEM fuel cells and metal hydrides on a zero-emission ship: A model-based approach [J].
Cavo, M. ;
Gadducci, E. ;
Rattazzi, D. ;
Rivarolo, M. ;
Magistri, L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (64) :32630-32644
[10]   Review on the Safe Use of Ammonia Fuel Cells in the Maritime Industry [J].
Cheliotis, Michail ;
Boulougouris, Evangelos ;
Trivyza, Nikoletta L. ;
Theotokatos, Gerasimos ;
Livanos, George ;
Mantalos, George ;
Stubos, Athanasios ;
Stamatakis, Emmanuel ;
Venetsanos, Alexandros .
ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (11)