Overall strategy for risk evaluation and priority setting of risk regulations

被引:30
作者
Hokstad, P [1 ]
Steiro, T [1 ]
机构
[1] SINTEF Technol & Soc, Dept Safety & Reliabil, N-7465 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
risk control; discourse; risk across sectors; RAS; health; environment; safety; HES; ethics; regulations; vulnerability;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2004.11.014
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper presents the framework of an approach to support planning and priority setting for risk control. Such an approach could assist government/regulatory authorities in their allocation of resources among different sectors. The term risk will here be used in a very wide sense, and it will include, but not restrict to, the traditional HES (Health, Environment and Safety) concept. An overall classification of risk (`loss categories'), to be used across sectors and directorates is suggested. The risk evaluation includes a number of factors not accounted for in a standard risk assessment, but should be taken into account when authorities set priorities regarding risk control. Sociological, psychological and ethical perspectives are included, and the need for a discourse during the decision process is pinpointed. The paper also discusses the potential inclusion of cost benefit analyses in such an approach. The indicated approach is denoted Risk Across Sectors (RAS), and suggestions regarding the process to implement it are given. Such an implementation process will by itself increase the knowledge and competence of the involved parties. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 111
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Adams J, 1995, RISK
[2]  
[Anonymous], RATIONAL RISK POLICY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 61508 IEC
[4]  
Aven T., 1992, Reliability and Risk Analysis
[5]   POLITICS AND SCIENTIFIC EXPERTISE - SCIENTISTS, RISK PERCEPTION, AND NUCLEAR WASTE POLICY [J].
BARKE, RP ;
JENKINSSMITH, HC .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1993, 13 (04) :425-439
[6]   Towards a paradigm for research on social representations [J].
Bauer, MW ;
Gaskell, G .
JOURNAL FOR THE THEORY OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR, 1999, 29 (02) :163-+
[7]  
Bedford T., 2001, Mathematical tools for probabilistic risk analysis
[8]   MODEL MONOPOLY AND COMMUNICATION - SYSTEMS THEORETICAL NOTES ON DEMOCRATIZATION [J].
BRATEN, S .
ACTA SOCIOLOGICA, 1973, 16 (02) :98-107
[9]  
Douglas M., 1986, RISK ACCEPTABILITY A
[10]  
DOUGLAS M, 1966, PURITY DANGERS